Obama Is A Peanut Farm Away from Carter

[Wiglaf]

How would the other party run an even worse candidate than one of the worst presidents ever? I don't think this has ever really happened but thanks for trying. Nor have any US elections been rigged, perhaps living in China has confused you, here everything is free. Try not to get run over by a tank over there, I am out of time for your blue faces and blank stares

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
How would the other party run an even worse candidate than one of the worst presidents ever? I don't think this has ever really happened but thanks for trying.

Wiggy, there's always someone worse. I'll bet there is even someone worse than you.

Nor have any US elections been rigged, perhaps living in China has confused you, here everything is free. Try not to get run over by a tank over there, I am out of time for your blue faces and blank stares

Well, there was the 2000 election. But these were just a few examples to be thrown out there. You can add more, if you want.

[Ben Kenobi]

That the other party ran an even worse candidate? That the election was rigged? What a stupid way to ensure that one of the worst presidents is excluded from that list.

True. It excludes LBJ.

[DaShi]

LBJ was a national hero.

[Wiglaf]

In addition to killing Kennedy, he basically started major US involvement in Vietnam. National hero my ****. And I have no idea what Kenobi is talking about, he was elected only once.

[Ben Kenobi]

Technically, he served two terms, the last part of Kennedy's and his own.

I would certainly be willing to expand my definition to include him.

[DaShi]

I thought you supported the Vietnam war and the killing of JFK? What have you done to Wiggy?

[Dinner]

Originally posted by DanS
I think Bush will be considered a reasonably good president in hindsight. For one, I think we'll win both Iraq and Afghanistan over the long-term. And we've not had another major terrorist attack under his watch. Of course, there's the chance that none of this turns out as I expect, in which case he would be judged more harshly.

But wait, there wasn't a major terrorist attack on US soil 6 years prior to 9/11.

[Cyclotron]

Originally posted by Oerdin
But wait, there wasn't a major terrorist attack on US soil 6 years prior to 9/11.

[Wiglaf]

That was in 1995. The point is still retarded, since we know we've foiled many plots, including one with a dirty bomb.

[Cyclotron]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
That was in 1995.

Uh...

Originally posted by Oerdin
But wait, there wasn't a major terrorist attack on US soil 6 years prior to 9/11.

[Wiglaf]

Yes. 1995+5=2000. 1996+6=2001. 9/11 occurred in 2001. Do I need to spank some more ass mathematically before you wise up here?

Anyway he disregards the USS Cole bombing of 2000 as well, he's just off base.

[Cyclotron]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
1996+6=2001.

Do I need to spank some more ass mathematically before you wise up here?

[Wiglaf]

Fine. Even if 1996+6=2000, this further proves my point.

Edit: Here is the straight fact, you have tried to confuse me. 1995+6=2001, which was the original point, thanks

[Cyclotron]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Even if 1996+6=2000

Strike 2