Originally posted by Pekka
yeah, go on, defend the practice straight from hell. a) it doesn't make sense b) it limits the freedom of citizens because of their age c) sounds like nanny state to me, which is the trademark for welfare states.
How about not letting adults out, between 18 and 28? I'm sure they are more dangerous, ESPECIALLY at night.
yeah, go on, defend the practice straight from hell. a) it doesn't make sense b) it limits the freedom of citizens because of their age c) sounds like nanny state to me, which is the trademark for welfare states.
How about not letting adults out, between 18 and 28? I'm sure they are more dangerous, ESPECIALLY at night.
You rock. I am in awe of your wisdom.
Fight Ageism: http://www.youthrights.org
) then they would have heightened security. Especially after all the WTO stuff that's been going on lately. I can understand officers attempting to prevent the riff-raff from rioting or violently protesting, if that's the case. Che is a scruffy guy, from whatI recall, maybe he had some molotov cocktails in that backpack.
ACK!
Comment