Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why the US has to be and should be "imperialist"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Albert

    _none of the countries in europe are a "racial" nation. all have large immigration populations to a lesser or wider respect integrated.

    _there is no way something can be classified as "superior" to something else since "superior" is judged by different critria by each one.

    Comment


    • #17
      Speer, the US IS a superior country, that's true...

      Don't listen to all this piss ants, we're better than they are.
      Long time member @ Apolyton
      Civilization player since the dawn of time

      Comment


      • #18
        And I thought Fez was a dope
        I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.

        Asher on molly bloom

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Why the US has to be and should be "imperialist"

          Originally posted by Albert Speer
          ideally, major nations should not be pushing smaller countries around but it's bound to happen... and it's far better that the US is involving itself in the affairs of foreign nations than having China or some other country do the same...

          why? because the US is a superior country. aside from the higher standard of living of americans compared to the Chinese, for example, the US is also on a higher level of nation as the US is an idealogical nation. China (as well as nearly every country in the world) is an ethnic state... a Chinese empire would undoubtedly oppress the non-Chinese and base their entire nation on racialism. The US has great ethnic diversity and, because of this, is a more socially advanced country.

          better the US than the Chinese or the Russians or whoever else...


          thanks
          I thought it was a satire, but seems not after seeing the replies... so here's my 2 cents.

          America beeing superior: in what?
          Here is in what it has serious problems proposing it is not:
          - Average capacity to buy went down so much that the double revenues may not suffice (two parents working)
          - USA is the country with the most people in prison
          - USA has some problems of many sorts and a president that made his cash from post-1991 Iraq (thx to father) that wasn't elected by majority of population's voices
          - USA's politicians seriously want Iraq for its oil and it's not humanitarian

          Exemple: Your politicians (not the population, who's not daily informed about such things...) placed Saddam to power because he gave advantages on oil, then they went against when he went against them ; and it wasn't humanitarian since USA knew he was using chemical stuff and all on Iran and Iraqi civilians, with their support.


          The problem is simple and it's not the Americans. It's that the people who control USA are the WORST Americans. As any country, the worst people aren't good... Instead, they support oil lobby and other important corporations.
          Go GalCiv, go! Go Society, go!

          Comment


          • #20
            how in god's name is the US not the most socially advanced nation in the world... Germany is a racial nation... Sweden is a racial nation... in terms of the progress of civilization, those are inferior forms of statehood. a multi-national idealogical nation (ie- to an extent the Roman Empire and the various Islamic Caliphates in the past... and now, much more pronounced, the US) is superior...
            erm, you sdound like a nazi.

            Also, what is so important about race? Just because eveyone in Sweden is swedish, i guess they are an inferior country.

            I mean, look how stupid the average american is (no offense ment to americans, but it is true in many cases, and its not US specific, britain is started to build up quite an amazingly brain dead middle class right now).

            What gives the USA such supremacy over everyone else? just because it has lots of different races means nothing, Britain is full of 'races' : Scots, Welsh, English, Pakistani, Indian, Jewish, Irish, and has had a history full of imigration from the Celts and romans, to the vikings and saxons. So I guess, considering Britain has have 2000 years of this to the USA's 400, I guess that Britain should rulle the world instead.
            eimi men anthropos pollon logon, mikras de sophias

            Comment


            • #21
              Sorry...sorry...

              I lost my mind there for a sec.



              Though Americans are a bit smarter than anyone else...and alot better looking!
              Long time member @ Apolyton
              Civilization player since the dawn of time

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Re: Why the US has to be and should be "imperialist"

                Originally posted by Trifna
                - USA's politicians seriously want Iraq for its oil and it's not humanitarian
                That's one of the wierdest things I have ever heard given the fact that Iraq is more than willing to sell oil to the US.
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #23
                  The whole race theory is bunk, but then you seem to like to turn everything to race... Some of the European countries have very high percentages of recent immigrants (Luxembourg 40%, Netherlands ~20%) as well as whole populations (like the french Huguenotes) mixing earlier. Neither did we take till the 1960's to give equal rights to people of a different colour.

                  Any country where 50 years ago apartheid ruled can hardly make a claim to be the most civilised country in the world. And if we go by quality of living Scandinavian countries are so far ahead of you it is not funny anymore (social healthcare -check; 100% literacy - check; low crime rates - check; etcc)

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    "The United States is, without a doubt, the most socially advanced society in the world."

                    -Albert Speer

                    What about....



                    CANADA
                    Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                    "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                    2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by obiwan18
                      What about....

                      CANADA
                      You are just a backwater territory of ours though.
                      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Oh, wow. Statements like this almost make Fez look like a deep-thinking genius. But what the hell, I'll play along.

                        First, let me make my own nationalistic statement that Canada is probably the most socially advanced country on the planet - and the UN would agree (ok, we slipped to number 2 last year ) The US is simply the most productive country in the world, which does not equal socially advanced.

                        Second, if you want to consider why the US is as powerful as it is, the answer is simple - it is a massive country, blessed with more natural resources than any other (ok, maybe Russia is comparable) and has never had a proximate competitor or threat of attack. It has nothing to do with an inherent "greatness" of the American people, especially since the American people over the years have been largely from other countries anyway.

                        Third, .... why bother. The arguement is just so asinine.
                        "The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
                        "you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
                        "I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - Dissident

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Kontiki
                          Third, .... why bother. The arguement is just so asinine.
                          You will notice that asinine starts with Albert's initials.



                          ACK!
                          Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by The Andy-Man
                            erm, you sdound like a nazi.
                            Look at his handle

                            My favourite posts have been those which compare Fez to Speer It's pretty bad when you're seen as worse than Fez.
                            "Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
                            You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez

                            "I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              My favourite posts have been those which compare Fez to Speer It's pretty bad when you're seen as worse than Fez.

                              The next thing will be Speer writing me PMs like "I want to **** and *** all over you my gay apolytener *****" as good ol' Fez used to
                              I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.

                              Asher on molly bloom

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Re: Re: Why the US has to be and should be "imperialist"

                                Originally posted by DinoDoc
                                That's one of the wierdest things I have ever heard given the fact that Iraq is more than willing to sell oil to the US.
                                Not at the price US wants it!! They're willing to sell it of course, but not basing on US lobbies' interests.
                                Go GalCiv, go! Go Society, go!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X