All this nit-picking is well and good to a point, but the central fact remains that the US government was structured in a way that was, at its inception, unlike anything that had come before it. To pen down a bill of rights for citizens, to proclaim equality for all (true, that "all" was selective at the outset...no denying that, but since then, the sheer flexibility of the system--another inherent strength--has evolved to become much more inclusive. Is there anyone who would disagree with this?)....unheard of! To turn our back on the divine right of kings and royal bloodlines? Egad!
So yes...I would say that there are some pretty significant differences.
Does this make the US of A the "best"? I would contend that BEST is far too subjective a term to have any real relevance. Best by what set of criterion?
Likewise, the USofA has the largest economy in the world. This is not a matter of conjecture or debate, but an economic fact of life. Still, this does not constitute a notion of "best" (though it does point to an indication that folks in the USA have a certain knack for using and growing capital...if not, we certainly could not have grown and surpassed our European fathers inside the short span of 200 years).
-=Vel=-
So yes...I would say that there are some pretty significant differences.
Does this make the US of A the "best"? I would contend that BEST is far too subjective a term to have any real relevance. Best by what set of criterion?
Likewise, the USofA has the largest economy in the world. This is not a matter of conjecture or debate, but an economic fact of life. Still, this does not constitute a notion of "best" (though it does point to an indication that folks in the USA have a certain knack for using and growing capital...if not, we certainly could not have grown and surpassed our European fathers inside the short span of 200 years).
-=Vel=-
Comment