Liberals need to stop sneering at people

[Odin]

The amount of red in Minnesota makes me puke.

[Dinner]

Why? On the whole the state is still blue.

[Pax]

Originally posted by Oerdin


Che: I believe his map shows that we already have all the urban areas we're going to get. If we want more votes we have to try to take a few rural areas from the Republicans. Other wise we continue to lose.

Absolutely right. I think we should target some specific areas and just acknowledge losses in others so we can form a majority.

[Whaleboy]

So could someone remind me what the argument against liberals is here? I can't be arsed to read back the 8 pages since my last post

[Odin]

Originally posted by Oerdin
Why? On the whole the state is still blue.

Because I thought there would be more blue around the Twin Cities.

[Harry Tuttle]

Originally posted by Whaleboy
So could someone remind me what the argument against liberals is here? I can't be arsed to read back the 8 pages since my last post

You guys ***** and moan to much to be elected. Also, you smell bad.

[Pax]

Originally posted by Whaleboy
So could someone remind me what the argument against liberals is here? I can't be arsed to read back the 8 pages since my last post

The argument is that liberals are nasty bitter people and they need to stop sneering at the god fearing terrorist hating good ol boys.

[The Mad Monk]

Originally posted by Dissident


interesting. what are the black counties? This map clearly shows by Bush won my state. I really thought Kerry had a chance early on.

edit: that map is a little too big for the poly page

http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/

That's the home page. It's all explained there.

[Agathon]

I probably should have said "a conservative, and a Republican." Which nowadays makes him a moderate.

Hey, I like him. I'd have voted for him in 2000 happily.

So would I, if I had had the chance.

But it is a failure of the American system that such a candidate could not get elected.

McCain should have campaigned for the Dem nomination. He would have won hands down and could have kept his moderate stance without pandering to the wings of either party.

[Arrian]

So would I, if I had had the chance.

You must be joking. About voting for him happily, I mean. I could see you chosing him as the lesser of two evils, but happily? You're a commie. Does not compute.

-Arrian

[Kuciwalker]

@ Agathon voting for McCain, a social and economic conservative

[Agathon]

You must be joking. About voting for him happily, I mean. I could see you chosing him as the lesser of two evils, but happily? You're a commie. Does not compute.

You don't understand commies then, do you? Communism is the future, right now it's time to stop things getting worse.

Out of all the candidates in recent years, McCain has been the least polarizing. While he wouldn't have been particularly leftist, he is by no means a fundie loon like Bush or a prat like Gore.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Wow... that'd be interesting to see Aggie backing a pro-life candidate who is for less taxes and less social spending .

[Agathon]

Wow... that'd be interesting to see Aggie backing a pro-life candidate who is for less taxes and less social spending

If it stops a candidate who is actually going to outlaw abortion and bankrupt the country, and alienates the fundies then it's a price worth paying.

[Jaguar]

Horse was right on, but now this thread has degenerated into suckiness.