Originally posted by Sikander
Wrong. The most effective part of the Swift Boat attacks were they drew attention to his radicalism in the 1970s. None of the other stuff stuck, but there was no question about his involvement with the VVAW and the crazy sh!t he testified to in congress.
Wrong. The most effective part of the Swift Boat attacks were they drew attention to his radicalism in the 1970s. None of the other stuff stuck, but there was no question about his involvement with the VVAW and the crazy sh!t he testified to in congress.
The election was yours to win. Bush has alienated much of the Republican base with his populist spending, military spending, recklessness in foreign policy etc. He's hurt himslf even worse in the center by aligning himself with the religious right. But Kerry could not take advantage of that. His votes came from further left than Gore's, his only success was that he turned out a higher percentage of them. Much of the country was left with a bitter choice between two candidates who they couldn't support ideologically.
Bull- every poll shows this to be wrong- the republican base was very motivated for Bush the whole time- the base of the republicans are NOT liberterians- they are the religious right. They won the election, not liberterians. Maybe you need a primer on what the republican party is now.
There are no more votes on either the left or the right, all those people voted this time because they both had a candidate who they could relate to, and they turned out like never before. The group who liked or at least could stand Bush was simply larger than the Kerry group. There is a hole between them which you could drive a truck through. Imagine if John McCain had run as an independant candidate for president and had as much money as Kerry did. I think he would have given both Bush and Kerry a run for their money.
Comment