Al Jazeera brodcasts message from bin Laden!

[Ted Striker]

THIS IS ****ING RIDICULOUS

THIS MAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN CAUGHT YEARS AGO

****ING MORE INCOMPETENCE FROM OUR DEAR LEADER

[Ted Striker]

I do believe this tape IS a code, it's not really a "secret" code as much as it is a signal

The part about Bush reading the whole goat story was very detailed, I think that's the go signal.

Let's hope everybody stays safe this weekend.

NOT CATCHING THIS GUY IS SO INCOMPETENT

I firmly believe that this administration has absolutley NO IDEA where he is hiding.

[Ted Striker]

**** is about to hit the fan

[Sprayber]

Originally posted by Ted Striker
THIS IS ****ING RIDICULOUS

THIS MAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN CAUGHT YEARS AGO

****ING MORE INCOMPETENCE FROM OUR DEAR LEADER

Your right. After they attacked a US warship and bombed US embasseys he should have been taken care of

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Sprayber


Your right. After they attacked a US warship and bombed US embasseys he should have been taken care of

[Frozzy]

The more I think about it the more I think that Bin Laden wants Bush for four more years.

Fact of the matter is, at the moment the GOP have the easier job of spinning this because, quite frankly, it affirms the war on terror is still pertinent and Bush is the incumbent, while Kerry cannot be seen to be capitalising on an enemy's word.

So while Bush has the easier job, why didn't Bin Laden actively challenge the GOP line? Moreso, why did he affirm that the war on terror is an extremely important issue? The reason is quite obvious really. While Bush continues to go off on overseas field trips, anti-US hatred is stirred up and they look for their leader, Bin Laden, who is apparantly quite cosy because of Bush's incompetence. Bin Laden gets more recruits, will be safer for four more years at least while he has support, and the US will fall into a state in which its armed forces simply cannot keep up.

Brilliant strategy really.

[Guynemer]

As crass as I feel spinning this back to "how it affects the election," I think at the very least Bush has to feel somewhat relieved that this has now pushed the missing-explosives story off the front page.

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Kalius
The more I think about it the more I think that Bin Laden wants Bush for four more years.

Fact of the matter is, at the moment the GOP have the easier job of spinning this because, quite frankly, it affirms the war on terror is still pertinent and Bush is the incumbent, while Kerry cannot be seen to be capitalising on an enemy's word.

So while Bush has the easier job, why didn't Bin Laden actively challenge the GOP line? Moreso, why did he affirm that the war on terror is an extremely important issue? The reason is quite obvious really. While Bush continues to go off on overseas field trips, anti-US hatred is stirred up and they look for their leader, Bin Laden, who is apparantly quite cosy because of Bush's incompetence. Bin Laden gets more recruits, will be safer for four more years at least while he has support, and the US will fall into a state in which its armed forces simply cannot keep up.

Brilliant strategy really.

Bin Laden likes Bush because Bush is the greatest terrorist recruiter of them all

Also his incompetence works in Bin Laden's favor

[Frozzy]

Precisely

[Ted Striker]

[Sprayber]

I think everyone is trying to see this in whatever light supports their candidate. Spinning it around in their heads until their opinions are only confirmed when in reality this video is as important as any of the others. Meaning not worth a ****. But if it makes everyone feel good then I suppose it's ok.

[Ted Striker]

true

[Alex]

Originally posted by Sprayber


He should be since he is being held in a facility outside Washington and forced to produce tapes which then find their way to jeezie TV.

yes, and bush periodically releases one of these tapes to get the "war on terror" thing going on...

[Whoha]

Transcript:

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2.htm

Nothing specific mentioned, though from the language it is probably recent. He didn't rail against the afghan elections which I think is interesting considering the argument hes trying to make here.

also, they held back about 4 minutes of it, saying it "wasn't newsworthy".

[Moral Hazard]

Idiotically I declare a war I can never win, against the great Ted Striker.

I remember his input into the great and venerated econ threads of yesteryear and I am loathe to criticize, I feel I must though. Ted Striker has taken his status of popularity from 'I would hit it' and soiled it the muck of partisan politics. So it is with a heavy heart that I must

Ted Striker