Bush bashes Tory leader!

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

That's why Bush's reaction (Rove's) is strange. Don't those guys have a clue how politics work?

I'm sure they know why Howard is doing this. I just don't think they care. The War on Terror is their sacred cow and this is a message to Howard and others not to **** with them on this.

If true, they are ****ed. They would care not what other people think, or what reality is. They would only care about their own welfare and no one elses.

[Drake Tungsten]

Why would we fear a bunch of drunken pornmongers?

They have the same vices as you, thus making it easy for them to understand the Canadian psyche and defeat you. I think Sun Tzu mentioned a similar situation in The Art of War. It involved drunken pornmongers, at the very least.

[KrazyHorse]

Anyway, the point is that the Bush administration acts like a spoiled child when it comes to criticism. **** 'em. They make it easy to score cheap points by telling them to sod off. Elections in Britain are going to start revolving around who can put as much distance between themselves and the US if this keeps up.

[Drake Tungsten]

If true, they are ****ed. They would care not what other people think, or what reality is. They would only care about their own welfare and no one elses.

I don't think they care about the War on Terror so much for their own welfare. Whether you agree with their view or not, I think it's clear that the Bush administration views the War on Terror as a threat to the welfare of the whole world, which is why they react so aggressively against those they believe are weakening the cause. Very similar to the American Cold War mindset, which is why I brought that conflict up earlier.

[KrazyHorse]

Maybe the picture of Blair posing with Dubya will dog him as much as the one where Cheney's pumping Saddam's hand and smiling for the cameras.

[Drake Tungsten]

Don't you mean Rumsfeld?

[KrazyHorse]

Whatever. One of the douchebags running your country. They all sort of blend together after a while.

[Drake Tungsten]

Consider yourself lucky that you don't have to "choose" between douchebags this November.

Then again, the Candian elections this year did seem to have a high percentage of ****ing douches in the running. Maybe you understand my pain all too well...

[KrazyHorse]

I'd choose the one which hasn't had the chance to prove its monumental incompetence yet (the worst since before WWII in my opinion).

Vote for Bush. I'm serious. It makes me happy to see people abusing themselves.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
True, but this scenario depends on Blair being unelectable. Rove must not think he is and the man knows his stuff.

I should want to trust the opinions of the leaders of parties in the actual country being debated. Maybe that's just me. Call me old fashioned if you will.

Now, I'm sure Laz will be along shortly to assure us that Tories are indeed idiots, and that Rove does indeed have a better grasp of the situation than they ever could.

Also, the actual scenario is what the Tories think can win them an election, and what could lose it for them. Being pro Iraq sure as hell could lose it for them. To get rid of the stink they have to go farther than anyone else, because people imagine them to be the most ready and willing to sign up for such things.

[KrazyHorse]

Then again, the Candian elections this year did seem to have a high percentage of ****ing douches in the running

The Bushies are head and shoulders above all their competition, both domestic and foreign.

[Drake Tungsten]

I'm not voting for either. The only question for me is whether I'm voting at all. The third parties are **** this year and the odds of my absentee ballot being counted at all are pretty slim. Not sure if it is worth the effort.

The Bushies are head and shoulders above all their competition, both domestic and foreign.

Kerry passed Bush in the douchebag sweepstakes long ago. At least Bush might be fun to have a beer (or a line ) with...

[Drake Tungsten]

Now, I'm sure Laz will be along shortly to assure us that Tories are indeed idiots, and that Rove does indeed have a better grasp of the situation than they ever could.

He (Laz) is a smart man.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

If true, they are ****ed. They would care not what other people think, or what reality is. They would only care about their own welfare and no one elses.

I don't think they care about the War on Terror so much for their own welfare. Whether you agree with their view or not, I think it's clear that the Bush administration views the War on Terror as a threat to the welfare of the whole world, which is why they react so aggressively against those they believe are weakening the cause. Very similar to the American Cold War mindset, which is why I brought that conflict up earlier.

Are they planning on burning down the village of Britain to save it?

[Drake Tungsten]

Are they planning on burning down the village of Britain to save it?

Where'd that non-sequitur come from?