Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Fwench.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I don't think it is so much discrimination in every case. We had muslims at college who demanded vacation during Ramadon and other muslim holidays, and wanted no ramifications (extra school hours, cut vacation time) to make up for it.

    Now discrimination and racism are present no doubt, but there is a fine line between equality and special privlages. I disagree with the headscarfes ban, but the French are applying the ban across the board on all relgions. That is not discrimination.
    "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Akka

      Well, that does qualify you for being retarded, then.
      How would like to be sue for slander. I have than non-verbal IQ of over 150, and they cannot measure my verbal IQ as I have than very hight abilitiy to read and understand what I than reading. Than ****** person cannot use than computer without help from than adult. I can install window it my window go bad they cannot.
      By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by notyoueither


        Mogul emperors ruled a large area of South Asia from the 16th century until the end of the 18th century. They attempted to convert the Sikhs to Islam, but were unsuccessful. It has been said of one of the Sikh Gurus (considered by many Sikhs to have been the last guru) that "Had there been no Guru Gobind Singh, the entire country would have gotten circumcised" i.e. been converted to Islam.
        Then in El Paso we are trying to convert the handful of Sikhs we have, it we donot allow then to take part in firday prayer we cannot convert then. India right now treat Sikhs alot worst than the Mogul emperors ever did. India is shut down Sikhs place of workship. In the Korea it clear state other religious place of workship must be respect. It than moslim burn down than christian church the Islamic state must help rebuilt than new one.
        By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Patroklos
          I don't think it is so much discrimination in every case. We had muslims at college who demanded vacation during Ramadon and other muslim holidays, and wanted no ramifications (extra school hours, cut vacation time) to make up for it.

          Now discrimination and racism are present no doubt, but there is a fine line between equality and special privlages. I disagree with the headscarfes ban, but the French are applying the ban across the board on all relgions. That is not discrimination.
          Actually it is - it's discrimination against religion in general.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by SpencerH
            Hopefully this hasn't come up before. AFAIK the basis for banning headscarves is the separation of church and state. So does this mean that non-muslims can wear headscarves since presumably they wouldn't be wearing them for any religious purposes.
            It dependence on how the law is written. I believe it is written that all headscarves are ban even worn by non-muslim as than hight ranking KGB secrect police man once told me the law can be bumb and supity.
            By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Spiffor

              More precisely: they were cut from mainstream society. Because of rampant racism and discrimination (a commitee's report has just been out, it is very accusatory). The French society, along with religionmongers pushed them increasingly towards forming their own community, cut from the rest.

              Had we accepted the idea that Muslims can be real Frenchies too (a pill that seems hard to swallow for many people, at least those with whome I discuss on the streets), things would have been entirely different: these people wouldn't have met closed doors wherever they go except at their kin's.
              This than point well taken. The reason the black vote for George Wallace for govnor was when he was than country court judge he set free falsely accue black people even it was than racist. He was than open racist instead of a hidden racist like some Northern are.
              By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

              Comment


              • Comment


                • Originally posted by lightblue
                  Gergo Wallaw was than racist but when he was on the bench as than judge he took his oath to ber fair and unbias seroius. When he was govon of his state than country judge sentence than 8 year kid to 20 year as than adult criminal for playing hooted from school. He was out of state so he cannot order the kid released so he order the kid kept away from all harden criminals. When he got back he call the judge than redneck idiot as the kid was black. He grant than pardon to the 5 black man falsely accue of rape by than white tramp in the 1930's, he look at the evidence they have there was so much douth about it that white tramp was rape at all, he thought it was the old white men fear about black man haveing sex with white woman.

                  So it you are than black voter the best choice was voteing for Walace as he was than fair man.
                  By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X