Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
Yes. When you roll a joint or pack a bowl, you are smoking marijuana. When you have a store-bought cigarette like a Marlboro or Parliament, you are inhaling not only Tobacco and Nicotine, but tar, arsenic, and a host of other carcinagenic, poisonous things that blacken your lungs.
Yes. When you roll a joint or pack a bowl, you are smoking marijuana. When you have a store-bought cigarette like a Marlboro or Parliament, you are inhaling not only Tobacco and Nicotine, but tar, arsenic, and a host of other carcinagenic, poisonous things that blacken your lungs.
When you smoke pot, you're smoking more than pot. Purely organic pot is nearly impossible to find, even where I live (every other store in Boulder is an organic alternative to the store next to it).
If there were government regulation and required labeling, at least you'd *know* what you were smoking. The same is a valid argument for the legalization of MDMA, which is commonly 'cut' (mixed) with cheaper, harder, and more dangerous drugs (methamphetamines are popular for this amongst MDMA producers). Not that our government has done this with cigarettes yet.
Plus, if people knew what they were smoking, maybe they'd be less likely to do so.
There's a difference between "habit-forming" and addiction, and the line between the two is somewhat subjective even among people who don't have an ideological agenda. In the hands of politically motivated people the line moves in the direction that favors their position. I'd argue addiction is an over-used term to increase the nanny-state and the prohibitionists would lean toward the view that (many) habits are addictions. 

Comment