Dirtbag Scumbags of the Right

[Mazarin]

Albert Speer,
your professor might have been confusing Bayer with Merck: http://pb.merck.de/servlet/PB/menu/1014710/index.html

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by JohnT


He is. While the Bayer confiscation was real (and lets not forget, an action of the government), their rights and patents were restored to them after the wars end. Or did you not equate 1917 with WW1?

Actually, Bayer wasn't restored its U.S. trademark rights until 1994.

[Tripledoc]

Originally posted by MrFun


I really don't care anymore what your thoughts are in this thread since you have no qualms about using stereotypes when talking about homosexuals.

They are not stereotyopes. They are totally accepted in social and historical studies. So free me from your political correctness, which is in my opinion totally misguided.

The idea that disrespect of women and ethnic minorities should not spring from an especially virulent form of male masculine homosexuaity, springs from the same PC school which seeks to lower any ethnic minority to an hyphenated -American.

And quite frankly, If the right is what turns gays on and vice versa, then so be it.

But that this should hurt the repute of ethic minorities and women I find simply disgusting.

Everyone knows that there is a connection between 'butch' homosexuality and Fascism, so it would be idiotic to hide the fact.
Especially since it is the 'normal' homosexuals which are being put into camps.

[Al B. Sure!]

I checked the Czech Budweiser and Anheuser-Busch Budweiser thing out... my professor was half-wrong on that as though they are seperate companies, they've been fighting over having the same name for over a century and it was not the result of a clever Adolphus Busch II stealing a German beer company's name after the first world war.

[JohnT]

Originally posted by Oncle Boris


They don't need armies. It's easier to bribe those who are running them. They are dangerous, because they can hijack funds amassed by millions of taxpayers more efficiently than any working-class citizen can.

Yes, and "bribery" works so well, hence no corporate income tax, no Sherman/Clayton anti-trust acts, no governmental regulatory bodies, nothing. Our entire history is a sham, a lie told us by the "Textbook Monopolists" who want us to believe that governments hold all the power, when in fact, it is Hewlett-Packard that controls the Navy and PepsiCo the Army.

[JohnT]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov


Actually, Bayer wasn't restored its U.S. trademark rights until 1994.

I didn't say "immediately", now did I?

[Al B. Sure!]

Mazarin:

yeah seems like it was Merck that he meant not Bayer though I am positive he said Bayer and not Merck especially because he mentioned that the Bayer logo of the vertical and horizontal Bayer name making a cross was the same on the pills of 'both' companies. so he did say Bayer though.

what does this mean? college professors are incompetent liars?

[KrazyHorse]

At least the ones where you go to school, yes.

[JohnT]

No, it means that they're human, which means that, at times, they can be incompetent and liars. Occasionally at the same time, as well.

[Mazarin]

From my experience some are, most are just a little confused.

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by JohnT
No, it means that they're human, which means that, at times, they can be incompetent and liars. Occasionally at the same time, as well.

Blatant generalizations are more fun, especially when I get to insult Speer.

[JohnT]

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by JohnT


Yes, and "bribery" works so well, hence no corporate income tax, no Sherman/Clayton anti-trust acts, no governmental regulatory bodies, nothing. Our entire history is a sham, a lie told us by the "Textbook Monopolists" who want us to believe that governments hold all the power, when in fact, it is Hewlett-Packard that controls the Navy and PepsiCo the Army.

Please, JohnT:

1. Who is it for that war in Iraq was waged?
2. In Vietnam?
3. Why was Salvador Allende killed?
4. Why was it the the CIA supported anti-Sandinist guerilla?

If you answered either "Halliburton", "Money" or "Lockheed-Martin" to any of these questions you are obviously wrong.

There is something Machiavelli calls "Comfort and Indifference": people don't complain when they enjoy a decent standard of life.
This is needed for two reasons:
1. As Ford pointed out, at someplace someone ought to be able to frenetically consume the goods they produce.
2. To these places, bring some simulacre of justice, such as Medicare and anti-trust regulations. When that is done, the corporations aren't happy anymore. They then call for globalization- an economical doctrine by which they can exploit the world's workforce and resources to increase their profit and enrich their home country (so as to hide international crimes with local wealth). One of the greatest realization of this doctrine are the "free-zones", where the civil law does not apply. Nike makes extensive use of these in order to employ children and pay them even less than the already low minimal wage of thirld world countries. Did you know that peasants in Haiti protesting against such implantations were massacred by the army a few years ago, with full US support and acknowledgment?

Through exploitation of third world, nurture your country's wealth and claim it to be the result of free market. Use media trusts to convey your false messages to the population. Of course, the media world is probably the less regulated field regarding free-trade. Still wondering why?

So now, is that a shame? yes.
Is your history a lie? as the Republicans would want you to believe, yes. However, many AMERICAN historians have written independant and unbiased books depicting this. Go to your public library and read them before they feel like spoliating you this right.

[JohnT]

Yes, and we know those "other" people just aren't smart enough to enact their own laws ala the West. Good thing they have people like you to patronize them, dontcha think?

[JohnT]

Did you know that peasants in Haiti protesting against such implantations were massacred by the army a few years ago, with full US support and acknowledgment?

No, and neither does the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

http://www.cidh.oas.org/countryrep/Haiti90eng/chap.3a.htm