Dirtbag Scumbags of the Right

[Tripledoc]

Ok. I'm reading Al Franken (Jewish BTW) and I think he makes a pretty strong case that many famous media personalities who where until this moment totally unbeknownst to me, are in fact "greedy, evil, warmongering bigots.

And the funny thing is that they all support the Republican Party.

So:

For instance when Richard Mellon Scaife, a giver of 35$ million to the Heritage foundation, funded numerous other institutions like the Cato institute, the Hoover institution,the American enterprise Institute, and many more, called a journalist, and I quote:

"You ****ing commuist cvnt" and said, she was ugly and her teeth terrible, and when he bid her good-bye said to her "Don't look behind you!".

, well then i would just have to ask whether the socallled liberal segment of the American society is going to stand to accept this bvllsheet.

And what about push polls. Those who know are in the "know".

Well. As a European I would just have to say that the Republican Perty now stands for me as the most ultimate form of evil the world has ever seen. More evil than the Nazi party because it has more power, and it is much more dishonest. You just don't treat a woman that way.

[Harry Tuttle]

I'd like to respond, but I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

[JohnT]

You are Sava's DL, aren't you?

But you're right - one person calling a woman a **** is so much worse than another killing 6 million people because of their religion.

[Tripledoc]

Originally posted by JohnT
You are Sava's DL, aren't you?

But you're right - one person calling a woman a **** is so much worse than another killing 6 million people because of their religion.

No.

I am saying that a person who calls a respectable woman "a fvcking communkst cvnt", because she discloses his ties to the Republican Party is not a real gentleman.

And if the Republican Party is being funded by pimps or homosexuals, then I, as a European would simpy have to reject that in all it's entirety.

[JohnT]

"And the funny thing is that they all support the Republican Party."

And why is this odd, coming from Al Franken? It would be like complaining that all Limbaugh does is bash Democrats - well, duh!

[Imran Siddiqui]

I am saying that a person who calls a respectable woman "a fvcking communkst cvnt", because she discloses his ties to the Republican Party is not a real gentleman.

And what if he didn't want those ties disclosed for business reasons or something? Then the woman was out of line and deserved being called what she was.

[Tripledoc]

Originally posted by JohnT
"And the funny thing is that they all support the Republican Party."

And why is this odd, coming from Al Franken? It would be like complaining that all Limbaugh does is bash Democrats - well, duh!

All I know about mr. Limbaugh is that he had a pimple on his behind so that he could not take over from us during the war in Indochine. Please do not sidetrack the issue.

[JohnT]

Originally posted by Tripledoc


No.

I am saying that a person who calls a respectable woman "a fvcking communkst cvnt", because she discloses his ties to the Republican Party is not a real gentleman.

And if the Republican Party is being funded by pimps or homosexuals, then I, as a European would simpy have to reject that in all it's entirety.

Naw, you're not Sava's DL. Sava has more sense than to say that he didn't say something just 3 posts after he said it.

Well. As a European I would just have to say that the Republican Perty now stands for me as the most ultimate form of evil the world has ever seen. More evil than the Nazi party because it has more power, and it is much more dishonest.

Question (for others, not for TripleSava): Can a person Godwinize their own thread in the very first post? Or does it have to come later?

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Tripledoc
And if the Republican Party is being funded by pimps or homosexuals, then I, as a European would simpy have to reject that in all it's entirety.

Oh, do tell--why are homosexuals akin to pimps?

[JohnT]

Originally posted by Tripledoc


All I know about mr. Limbaugh is that he had a pimple on his behind so that he could not take over from us during the war in Indochine. Please do not sidetrack the issue.

Huh?

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by JohnT
Huh?

He's referring to Limbaugh's Vietnam draft deferment.

[JohnT]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov


Oh, do tell--why are homosexuals akin to pimps?

Obviously TripleSava doesn't like either of the two groups. That's what makes them similar.

A homosexual is a Republican is a pimp is a Nazi. Get it?

[JohnT]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov


He's referring to Limbaugh's Vietnam draft deferment.

And Franken's Vietnam record is...?

Oh, wait: he didn't go either.

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by JohnT
You are Sava's DL, aren't you?

But you're right - one person calling a woman a **** is so much worse than another killing 6 million people because of their religion.

Hitler didn't give a fvck about these guy's religion. Don't start me on the Holocaust, because it can get ugly.

Hitler was a ****head and genocidic bastard, true. But he was part of a MAJOR European crisis that ran from 1914 to 1945.

On the other hand, American imperialism is much more dangerous in that it springs from itself with no other reason than pleasing its huge corporations. And it is winning, while Hitler was obviously doomed to failure.
In such a way, we can consider it more dangerous. Remember, danger is about potential threat, not past one.

But still, we could run a "death-statistics" contest. Trust me, if we considered the death toll of Vietnam + all US supported wars and despotic regimes, and then add indirect deaths caused by their economic policy (starvations caused in part by agricultural subsidies, refusal to let African countries manufacture generic medications), America would not be very far from the top, along with such great leaders as Mao, Stalin, Hitler and Pol Pot.

[Tripledoc]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui

I am saying that a person who calls a respectable woman "a fvcking communkst cvnt", because she discloses his ties to the Republican Party is not a real gentleman.

And what if he didn't want those ties disclosed for business reasons or something? Then the woman was out of line and deserved being called what she was.

But firstly he had not had time for a true philosophical discussion with her on the nature of communism, secondly if he did not want to have those tie to the Republican Party denied he could have invited her for a dinner. Clearly he had no experience in how to handle a feisty woman. And I thinK that has to do that he is homosexual.