Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pope says condoms are no good against HIV

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    from dictionary dot com

    A religion or religious sect generally considered to be extremist or false, with its followers often living in an unconventional manner under the guidance of an authoritarian, charismatic leader.
    The followers of such a religion or sect.

    forget the extremist and false part (And unconventional manner part)

    a cult is a religion or sect under the guidance of a charismatic leader

    so catholics are possibly a cult, but most relgions are not

    but all religions started out as a a cult

    Jon Miller
    Jon Miller-
    I AM.CANADIAN
    GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

    Comment


    • #92
      relgion from dictionary dot com

      Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe.
      A personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief and worship

      Jon Miller
      Jon Miller-
      I AM.CANADIAN
      GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

      Comment


      • #93
        The Pope is right about condoms.

        In many poor villages in South East Asia the use of the condom is demonstrated with a banana.

        The village women put the condom over the banana every night and they still get pregnant!
        Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..

        Look, I just don't anymore, okay?

        Comment


        • #94
          You sure? They usually use ping-pong balls AFAIK
          Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
          Then why call him God? - Epicurus

          Comment


          • #95
            I can't really accept sex advice from consecrated virgins.
            Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
            "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

            Comment


            • #96
              They must have very sticky underwear when they wake up.
              Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
              Douglas Adams (Influential author)

              Comment


              • #97
                The dictionary definition of "cult" is useless, so I always think of "cult" as meaning "a religion that exists more for the material benefit of its founders or administrators than for the spiritual well-being of its followers," which is, I think, what most of us mean when we say the word. Religions based on a genuine intent to help are not really cults in my estimation, and I would say that a faith can change into a cult and back again. While some say the Catholic church is evil, they strike me as generally concerned with the road to salvation, albeit in a wonky fashion, far different from the supervillian caricature "pornocracy" it became in the middle ages.

                Seriously Diss, you need to gain some perspective. How does the poor judgment of certain people condemn, like, a third of the world's population in your eyes? Especially on such a non-canonical issue. If a democratically elected official delivered an off-the-cuff statement to declare, say, that the works of Edgar Allan Poe were evil, would that make democracy as a system intrinsically wrong?

                In this situation, the Catholics are in a minority position, have very little sympathy going for them, and react like any cornered animal will, namely by biting at anything in reach. You can tell that this isn't really well-thought out doctrine just by what it says: condoms are wrong because they do not prevent AIDS. Between most married couples there is presumptively little risk of infection, assuming no hanky-panky, and the Church disapproves of all fornication in principle, so all in all it's moot from their POV. Certainly there's no point in treating this as canon law.
                1011 1100
                Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                Comment


                • #98
                  This is why condoms are important, if the attitude can be changed so that condoms are the default option for sexual partners, then the number of infections will go down!
                  Abstaining until marriage would be much better for reducing infections.

                  Ali:

                  Point well taken.
                  Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                  "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                  2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Abstaining until marriage


                    So if one never marries (perhaps due to the fact that one thinks this very institution is redundant (not necesairly my view, but plenty of people see it this way) ), one is to stay a virgin forever???
                    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                    Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Ben Kenobi

                      Abstaining until marriage would be much better for reducing infections.


                      And while we are at it, we can also tell people that if everyone stopped drinking alcoholic beverages, there will be no more drunk-driving induced auto accidents, public brawls, date rape, and property vandalism related to drunkness.

                      A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                      Comment


                      • Because it's right
                        "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                        I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                        Middle East!

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by MrFun




                          And while we are at it, we can also tell people that if everyone stopped drinking alcoholic beverages, there will be no more drunk-driving induced auto accidents, public brawls, date rape, and property vandalism related to drunkness.

                          Well, yes. That's not much of an argument Mr. Fun.
                          "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                          Comment


                          • My point is, Dr. Strangelove, is that you're not going to get people to abstain from sex, anymore than you're going to get all drinkers from stopping their consumption of alcoholic drinks, just because sometimes, social ills emerges from alcoholic consumption.
                            A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                            Comment


                            • You want to abstain from sex? Simple, get married.
                              Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..

                              Look, I just don't anymore, okay?

                              Comment


                              • Here's more fuel to the fire...

                                Cardinal surprised by reaction over his criticism of condoms
                                Associated Press
                                Vatican City, October 14

                                A top Vatican cardinal said he was surprised by the reaction over his contention that condoms don't adequately protect against transmitting the virus which causes AIDS.

                                Last week, the United Nations' health agency strongly contested Cardinal Alfonso Lopez Trujillo's claim, which came in an interview he gave in September.

                                The Vatican opposes condoms as a way to fight AIDS, saying chastity is the best way to prevent its spread.

                                "I imagined the subject was better known. Instead, I am surprised with some of the reactions," the prelate, who heads the Pontifical Council for the Family, said in comments on Monday.

                                "Among my concerns was my intention not to mislead people, especially the youth, by making them think there is safety, where in fact safety is not even proven," the cardinal said.

                                "I simply wished to remind the public, seconding the opinion of a good number of experts, that when the condom is employed as a contraceptive, it is not totally dependable, and that the cases of pregnancy are not rare. In the case of the AIDS virus, which is around 450 times smaller than the sperm cell, the latex material obviously gives much less security.
                                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X