Well, that's a pretty nice compensation offer!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Team Info and Contacts - PAL
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
That is too good a deal! Something is fishy here.
mhLast edited by mostly-harmless; November 26, 2008, 13:15.
Comment
-
That is a very nice offer. It makes their claim of an over-eager turnplayer much more believable. And it looks like they care a lot about their reputation and/or good relations with us. This also explains delay in their response time: agreeing on this kind of compensation probably took them a few days.
Originally posted by mostly-harmless
That is too good a deal! Something is fishy here.
mh
Comment
-
Proposed text v0.1
Hi whiplash,
Thanks for the recentb emails regarding the Code of Laws-Monarchy deal. We were obviously very concerned when we saw that your team had traded in Monarchy from Imperio. We are happy with the compensation swap of Monotheism for CoL, and we're willing to consider further deals requiring co-ordinated research.
We have already completed Montheism, so would you like it straight away, or should we wait until you've completed Code of Laws?
yours etc
Feedback appreciated as always.
Comment
-
Another email from PAL:
Hi Realms,
I have taken over from Whiplash as envoy to Realms Beyond. Please address all future communication to me and I’ll feed it back to PAL.
Just to clarify, we did trade Monarchy with Imperio, but this has no bearing on the deal we struck with you guys. The Original deal still stands, so as soon you have monotheism we will happily hand over code of laws. Roughly how long until monotheism?
Anyway, lets look to the future … What are you guys planning on researching after monotheism? It might be a good idea for one of us to start perusing the bottom half of the tech tree; Metal Casting or Feudalism.
Thanks
PAL
Comment
-
Regarding the tech situation, I'd propose to waffle slightly on our plans: 'we need Monarchy and we're trying to make a deal with Imperio, but they don't move very quickly'.
As to the bottom of the tree, I'd propose that they go for MC cos they're IND and get a big benefit from cheap forges.
Comment
-
I think the last paragraph of your email should simply state that we will trade it as soon as they get code of laws and ask when they estimate that be. I don't think we want to be handing over monotheism with nothing in return.
I'm not sure what we should tell them regarding what we want to research next. Should we inform them that we are persuing aesthetics and literature?
Comment
-
I wouldn't tell them about Aesth and Lit. Add some waffle about their trade throwing our team into a tech discussion (do we tech Mon or trade for it, if we trade, what do we tech) so that our current plans aren't fixed.
Share with them the knowledge of Imp and Maths - and our fear that they are going for a Civil Service / Oracle sling?Quote: "All Happiness is the release of internal pressure"
Visit my Civ IV web site for information on mods that I am involved with or use and other Civ IV tools
woo hoo! My wife publishes her first book. Buy it now in paperback format at lulu and help me retire so I can write more BUG mod code.
Comment
-
Yeah - I wouldn't tell them exactly what we plan on researching just yet. Maybe tell them we aren't sure yet but don't plan on going down the bottom and suggest that they do that?
I wonder if they really thought that we were giving MOnarchy and them CoL? I remember way back when there being some confusion on their part about that.
But it might be a smokescreen...
Comment
Comment