But I think if we just avoid Deity & Cyber as hosts, that'll help save us a lot of time when we do have trouble. It would be good to have a third host option after CT & Moker.
Ozzy, what you say is not true, at least not about Deity. We have had many good sessions under Deity. It's just that if things go wrong we go to other hosts then the original host. And if things go wrong, things keep on going wrong (that's what we saw in the past many times). Thus backup hosts, like Deity and me yesterday, are most likely to fail because they only host if things go wrong.
Moker didn't go good as well, I think the 1st attempt failed, the 2nd worked for 6 turns, then things failed again. Yesterday we didn't fail because of hosts but because of complex coincidences that on one can track.
I think I failed yesterday because I hosted through my router. Eventhough my router worked fine last week I think it caused problems this week. And in the past it didn't work with me hosting because Deity couldn't join anybody else and therefor must always host.
I think CT is naturally the 1st host and I'm fine if Moker is the 2nd host but I must say that as a technician I'm a little bit worried that you label me as a bad host for incidents. Not because I wannabe a host that badly, but just because I think that I'm having one of the best computers and the best connections overhere, not to mention that Europe is most probably the best location to host from anyway.
I'm not sure where Moker is from and if his connection is very good as well, then we should continue with him.
Comment