OK. Of course, I will give Civ4 one opportunity (or two
).
I thnik C3C, even when add some goods to the game, is not better than PtW (IMHO). So, when I saw the ppt, and it makes me live my advertising times again, I feel a little scared.
I like 3D, of course. But I like Civ as an strategy game more than 3D. I understand, the graphics are what sell for now, but if the 3D is the only good to add to Civ3, well, I don't see the reason to buy Civ4.
And if Civ4 becames a less strategy game than Civ3. If it becames a "simpler" game, well, maybe I continue playing old games
).I thnik C3C, even when add some goods to the game, is not better than PtW (IMHO). So, when I saw the ppt, and it makes me live my advertising times again, I feel a little scared.
I like 3D, of course. But I like Civ as an strategy game more than 3D. I understand, the graphics are what sell for now, but if the 3D is the only good to add to Civ3, well, I don't see the reason to buy Civ4.
And if Civ4 becames a less strategy game than Civ3. If it becames a "simpler" game, well, maybe I continue playing old games
But if it's complex 3D fancy pancy stuff with lighting, lots of objects being rendered, shades, and loads of kiddo stuff flashing around it could mean a problem and cause "buggy" gameplay and crappy design. On the other hand 3D effects can be used the same way as in certain RTS games, where panning, rotating, scaling and such simple 3D routines are supported. If it's just a simple 3D map it's no problem...
or Hearts of Iron
Ok, I'm not upset... just very curious. How do you become a beta then?
Comment