And to pre-empt any but Bill Parcells' 3-4 defense was so good... Lawrence Taylor, Carl Banks, Harry Carson... okay, fine. But Aikman had a defense that was just as good, if not better statistically. The Giants were the a top-10 defense in total yards a few years during Simms' tenure but also jumped around a bit (11th in 88, 18th in 92) but let's look at the Cowboys:
1992: #1
1993: #10
1994: #1
1995: #9
1996: #3
1997: #2
Troy Aikman during the peak of his career never had a defense worse than top-10!
Vinny Testaverde could've been playing for the Cowboys during the 90's and would have won 3 Super Bowls easily!
Aikman was blessed by circumstance probably more than any QB has ever been.
Not saying he doesn't belong in the Hall but did he deserve to be a first-ballot? No. Does he deserve to be in over Phil Simms? Honestly, probably not, or at least the perceived disparity between the QB's shouldn't be as large as it is in the minds of Hall of Fame voters. Simms was a better quarterback and did more with less.
1992: #1
1993: #10
1994: #1
1995: #9
1996: #3
1997: #2
Troy Aikman during the peak of his career never had a defense worse than top-10!
Vinny Testaverde could've been playing for the Cowboys during the 90's and would have won 3 Super Bowls easily!
Aikman was blessed by circumstance probably more than any QB has ever been.
Not saying he doesn't belong in the Hall but did he deserve to be a first-ballot? No. Does he deserve to be in over Phil Simms? Honestly, probably not, or at least the perceived disparity between the QB's shouldn't be as large as it is in the minds of Hall of Fame voters. Simms was a better quarterback and did more with less.
Comment