1) How the **** would a kid who is adopted by two gay men be deprived of a father? Or if a kid was conceived through surrogacy and has two lesbian parents that allow for the biological father generous visitation rights?
As for the men, they are depriving their child of a mother. Alternative arrangements are always more prone to breakdowns then their equivalents.
2) Your argument that recognizing marriage as a civil right means right to force someone to marry you is utterly, completely retarded and asinine. RIGHT TO MARRY MEANS THAT YOU CAN CHOOSE TO MARRY SOMEONE WHO WISHES TO MARRY YOU provided they're both mentally competent adults and of age of consent. This means two people who wish to marry one another who happen to be gay men can do so, as it is their civil right.
Your STUPID remark about "forcing someone to marry you" makes as much sense if you tried applying it to U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on Loving versus Virginia - "oh no, if people of different races have right to marry one another, they can FORCE someone to marry him/her!"
This really is sad, because either you are so naturally stupid that you really believe civil right to marry means right to force someone to marry you, OR you KNOW that this is a completely false, fallacious argument but you present it anyway to distort the issue. Either way, it is just plain pathetic.
Comment