Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

[N35t0r]

Isn't that the same court that just heard the South African case against Israel? What did they decide? Gaza is a tough act to follow.

It decided that it will hear the case, and asked Israel to avoid genocide. It was all over the news.

[Dauphin]

You know you could read the ruling.....https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/defaul...d-01-00-en.pdf

[Ming]

He doesn't need to read it... He will just watch some video on the internet and it will tell him what to think.

[BeBMan]

Funny, Berz dropped a post in the IJC thread about that very matter.

[BeBMan]

Idea: let's let Putin have Tucker in exchange for Evan ​Gershkovich. That way we keep a convicted murderer in jail:

On 23 August 2019, Khangoshvili was assassinated in Kleiner Tiergarten, a park in Berlin by FSB operative Vadim Krasikov.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zelimkhan_Khangoshvili#Assassination

[-Jrabbit]

I don't see any need for an exchange. Just need the US to nullify Tuck-Tuck's passport and we're good.

[BlackCat]

Interesting discussion about what you would ask putin if you were a real journalist

[BlackCat]

This is quite funny too

[Berzerker]

Ukraine aid money is going to Alabama to produce the following systems: High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), Javelins, M1A1 Abrams tanks, M2A4 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, Hydra-70 rockets, M777 howitzer parts (Paladin M109A7), M88A2 Heavy Equipment Recovery…

Marc Thiessen on X asking Ala Sen Tuberville why he is voting against jobs.

Remember back before Bush and Biden lied us into invading Iraq protesters said no blood for oil and supporters denied it was about oil?

[BeBMan]

This is quite funny too

There's a huge gap between what Putin wants, and what those more on the nutty side in the US want, even when they seem to like Putin.

For those all that nonsense about the US, deep state, progressives, cancel culture, Obama or whatever maybe hugely important to hear as it strengthens their beliefs when Putin seemingly agrees/confirms them.

But it is all irrelevant to Putin unless he can exploit the divisions behind this to influence US public opinion in his favor.

Otoh Putin himself gains when using someone like Tucker as useful idiot to strengthen his own position in Russia. The long (pseudo-)historic part sells Putin's warped view on history to justify his aggression in Ukraine. Hardly anyone in the MAGA corner cares about that, but having Tucker around gives him another chance to sell his narrative, and in Russia Putin can present Tucker as some kind of the "real" America, because everyone in the US who is against Putin must be CNNCIAdeepstateObamasomething.

But it's funny indeed as Putin seems to suffer from that same historic illness which led various dictators previously to bore their audience with endless monologues

[Dauphin]

Nato is weaker than we think? And Russia is a helluva lot stronger. I've heard the Russian economy is doing well because the sanctions forced re-investment in Russia instead of oligarchs sending it abroad. China will back Russia in a war against Nato.

Missed this earlier. Russia's economy is doing well - it's GDP is one of the fasted growing, and growing faster than the West. That growth is caused (to an unspecified but significant degree) by increased spending by the Russian government on its military. Economic growth is great, but if the increase is then blown up or killed, it doesn't really help the long term economy even though you record a nice bump in GDP.

[-Jrabbit]

With today's report that Russia used their new hypersonic missile in a recent attack on Kiev, I expect we will have a Serb sighting shortly.

[BeBMan]

Indeed, and if he sticks around a little longer we all may celebrate the 2nd anniversary​ of this glorious 3 day war together next week

[Berzerker]

Economist editor @zannymb tells @jonstewart that arming Ukraine "is the cheapest possible way for the US to enhance its security. The fighting is being done by the Ukrainians, they're the people who are being killed. The US and Europe are supplying them weapons."

do you feel secure?​

[Geronimo]

Economist editor @zannymb tells @jonstewart that arming Ukraine "is the cheapest possible way for the US to enhance its security. The fighting is being done by the Ukrainians, they're the people who are being killed. The US and Europe are supplying them weapons."

do you feel secure?​

in perfect honesty I feel far more secure when Ukraine is getting those weapons than I do when that's blocked. Of course I feel least secure of all whenever Trump opens his piehole about NATO, but that's closely related.

[BlackCat]

It looks like the russian navy yet again has managed to destroy a number of Ukrainian sea drones only loosing a single ship in the process.

[BeBMan]

It didn't sink, just launched a special underwater amphibious landing operation, so it's all within standard mission parameters for this tpye of ship.

[BeBMan]

This is even weirder

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-helicopters-aircraft-missing-fsb-investigation-rosaviatsiya-1869107

[Uncle Sparky]

Stealth tech... maybe they just seem to have disappeared!... standard mission parameters, again.

[Geronimo]

https://p.dw.com/p/4cVje

Ukraine's withdrawal from Avdiivka is a big deal and likely a direct consequence to the non deliveries of military aid to Ukraine that have been missed since early November at least. Neither Ukraine nor Russia are going to settle this thing at sea or in the skies. If major new aid is not received soon, there will probably be a forced peace treaty followed by a total conquest of Ukraine within 5 years when the treaty is unceremoniously flushed on a some truly absurd pretense (timing dependent on elections).