Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
    "Yanukovych fled the country on February 22, 2014 after losing the support of his own party and security forces."

    I think he fled the evening of the 21st the day after he was framed for the massacre. That was the coup. You keep arguing it wasn't a coup because parliament - in the immediate aftermath of a massacre by the Ukrainian right wing to frame the leader - removed him because he fled the country. Nazis are slaughtering people, we'll call it democracy. Bing AI now? Who programs that? Might as well just stick with wikipedia.
    Don't be too hard on Bing for following his evil neocon masters. I also had the following revealing conversation with Bing that suggests among the programmers might be a kindred spirit or two for you Berz!

    Russia's stated objective in the special military operation was first to demilitarize Ukraine and secondarily to "denazify" Ukraine. at the rate established since the beginning of the special military operation in February 2022 how much longer will the operation need to continue to complete demilitarization of Ukraine?
    Bing's Response

    According to the information from the web search results, Russia launched its special military operation in Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and has since advanced rapidly into Ukrainian territory. As of April 6, 2022, Russian forces have captured the cities of Kharkiv, Dnipro, Zaporizhia, Mariupol, and Odessa, and are closing in on Kyiv. ¹²³

    The exact number of Russian troops involved in the operation is unknown, but estimates range from 100,000 to 200,000. ⁴⁵ Ukraine's military is much smaller and weaker, with about 150,000 troops and outdated equipment. ⁶⁷⁸ Ukraine has also received some military assistance from NATO and other countries, such as anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles, drones, and radars. ⁷⁹

    To estimate how much longer the operation will need to continue to complete demilitarization of Ukraine, we need to make some assumptions and simplifications. We will assume that:

    - Demilitarization means that Ukraine's armed forces are completely destroyed or surrendered, and that no significant resistance remains.
    - The rate of advance of Russian forces is constant and proportional to the ratio of their strength to Ukraine's strength.
    - The strength of each side is measured by the number of troops and the quality of their equipment.
    - The terrain, weather, logistics, morale, and other factors do not affect the outcome.

    Using these assumptions, we can use a simple mathematical model to calculate the time needed for Russia to demilitarize Ukraine. We will use the following formula:

    $$T = \frac{L}{R}$$

    where:

    - $T$ is the time in days
    - $L$ is the length of the front line in kilometers
    - $R$ is the rate of advance of Russian forces in kilometers per day

    To find $L$, we can use a map of Ukraine and measure the approximate distance between the current positions of Russian forces and the borders of Ukraine. We will ignore the Crimean Peninsula, which is already under Russian control. We will also ignore the western regions of Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, and Chernivtsi, which are far from the main front line and have not been attacked by Russia yet. Using a ruler tool on Google Maps[^10^], we get:

    $$L \approx 1{,}200 \text{ km}$$

    To find $R$, we need to estimate the strength ratio between Russia and Ukraine. We will use a simple index that multiplies the number of troops by a factor that reflects the quality of their equipment. We will assign a factor of 1 to Ukraine and a factor of 2 to Russia, based on the difference in their defense spending and modernization efforts. Using the estimates from the web search results⁴⁵⁶, we get:

    $$S_R = N_R \times F_R = (100{,}000 + 200{,}000) / 2 \times 2 = 300{,}000$$
    $$S_U = N_U \times F_U = 150{,}000 \times 1 = 150{,}000$$

    where:

    - $S_R$ is the strength index of Russia
    - $S_U$ is the strength index of Ukraine
    - $N_R$ is the number of Russian troops
    - $N_U$ is the number of Ukrainian troops
    - $F_R$ is the equipment factor of Russia
    - $F_U$ is the equipment factor of Ukraine

    The rate of advance of Russian forces is proportional to the ratio of their strength index to Ukraine's strength index. We will also assume that Russia can advance at a maximum speed of 100 km per day, based on historical examples of blitzkrieg tactics. Therefore,

    $$R = \min \left( \frac{S_R}{S_U}, 100 \right) = \min \left( \frac{300{,}000}{150{,}000}, 100 \right) = 100 \text{ km/day}$$

    Finally, we can plug in the values of $L$ and $R$ into the formula for $T$:

    $$T = \frac{L}{R} = \frac{1{,}200}{100} = 12 \text{ days}$$

    Therefore, based on this model, Russia would need about **12 days** to complete demilitarization of Ukraine at the current rate of advance.

    However, this is a very rough estimate that ignores many factors that could affect the outcome of the war. For example,

    - The strength ratio between Russia and Ukraine could change over time due to casualties, reinforcements, defections, or desertions.
    - The rate of advance of Russian forces could vary depending on the terrain, weather, logistics, morale, or resistance they encounter.
    - The length of the front line could change due to encirclements, breakthroughs, or counterattacks by either side.
    - The definition of demilitarization could change depending on the political and diplomatic situation, the international response, or the public opinion in both countries.

    Therefore, the actual time needed for Russia to demilitarize Ukraine could be much shorter or longer than 12 days, depending on how the war unfolds.

    Source: Conversation with Bing, 9/18/2023
    (1) Russia had ‘no choice’ but to launch ‘special military operation’ in .... https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1127881.
    (2) On conducting a special military operation - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_con...tary_operation.
    (3) Russian forces launch full-scale invasion of Ukraine. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/...ne-as-un-meets.
    (4) Putin Announces Special Military Operation in Eastern Ukraine. https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/rus...HMKssPMTur01Vh.
    (5) Western officials think Putin may formally declare war on Ukraine on .... https://www.businessinsider.com/puti...ficials-2022-5.
    (6) How Russia and Ukraine's militaries compare | CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/25/europ...ntl/index.html.
    (7) Infographic: Military capabilities of Russia and Ukraine. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/...ne-interactive.
    (8) Armed Forces of Ukraine - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_Forces_of_Ukraine.
    (9) How Long Could Ukraine Hold Out Against A New Russian Invasion?. https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-ukrai.../31614428.html.
    (10) 2023 Ukraine Military Strength - Global Firepower. https://www.globalfirepower.com/coun...id=ukraine.​
    of course I don't think Bing was being facetious. No, must've been prescient! We'' see, in 10 days. Yep.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by PLATO View Post
      So Andriivka, about 8 miles south of Bakhmut seems to be liberated. ​
      They liked it so much that they promptly took another one:


      Ukraine 'breaks through Russian defense line' near Bakhmut – commander


      Ukrainian troops have broken through a Russian defensive line south of Bakhmut, the commander of Ukraine's ground forces, General Oleksandr Syrskyi, said on Monday.

      "Fierce fighting continues in the area of Bakhmut," he said. "As a result of the successful actions of our troops, the enemy's defense line which runs [south] from Bakhmut to Gorlivka was broken."

      After Ukrainian forces retook the small villages of Andriivka and Klishchiivka over the weekend, the localized breakthrough represents a third small success south of Bakhmut ahead of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's United Nations address in New York this week.

      General Syrskyi claimed that the Russian army's 72nd, 31st and 83rd brigades had been "destroyed and have completely lost their capacity to fight." He cautioned however that "the general situation on the eastern front remains complicated."

      Speaking to DW, French political expert and former NATO director of policy planning Fabrice Pothier commented on the retaking of Andriivka and Klishchiivka, suggesting that they may be more important symbolically than tactically.

      "Being on higher ground, this could give the Ukrainian forces the upper hand in putting pressure on the Russians in Bakhmut to the point where they will possibly have to withdraw from the city," he said.

      "Clearly, the Ukrainians have chosen Bakhmut as a place to pin down Russian forces, and a potential retaking of Bakhmut could have a huge psychological effect, even on the Russian leadership, who themselves have made Bakhmut into the 'mother of all battles,' he continued.

      "So, the symbolic value should not be understated. As for the tactical value, I'd prefer to leave that to the Ukrainians. That will be up for debate come the end of the war."
      Overall these are small gain still. But maybe we still see some good Russian running, like last year.

      Blah

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

        In December 2017, Max Abrahms of the Council on Foreign Relations and John Glaser of the Cato Institute observed in the Los Angeles Times that "[ISIL] imploded right after external support for the 'moderate' rebels dried up,"

        Imagine that, ISIL collapsed when Trump stopped arming Obama's moderate rebels. We were running guns in and out of Ukraine before Russia reacted to the coup. I can tell what the people in these regions wanted just by looking at the direction they pointed their guns. They were shooting at the Nazi army Washington and Kiev sent to attack them, the Russian army didn't defend them until later in 2014 and that led to the Minsk Accords.



        There were millions of people in the Donbas who rejected the coup and we armed Nazis to kill them. Marcia Marcia Marcia doesn't even enter the picture.
        The Nazis were defeated just as troop and weapon shipments to Europe started dwindling. All those weapons the US was producing were being sent to the Nazis so that they could kill Russians! The US is responsible for WWII! It's all so clear now!
        Indifference is Bliss

        Comment


        • Berzerker
          Berzerker commented
          Editing a comment
          We were sending weapons/materials to Russia so they could kill Nazis back then. After WWII we started funding/arming the Banderites as part of our cold war. We have somewhat of a bipolar relationship with Nazis that Russians just cant appreciate. I guess losing 25m people to them left a dent in the Russian psyche.

        • N35t0r
          N35t0r commented
          Editing a comment
          No, that's what the MSM want you to think. Otherwise why would the Nazis collapse just when weapon shipments to Europe started winding down? Clearly Washington was arming the Nazis just to kill Russians.

      • they were doing that before wwii

        Comment


        • N35t0r
          N35t0r commented
          Editing a comment
          No, before WWII the Russians were arming the Nazis so that they would invade western Europe.

          After Barbarossa, the USA started arming the Nazis so that they would kill Russians instead. Otherwise why would the Nazis collapse just at the same time weapons shipments to Europe went down enormously?

      • Back to the war at hand...

        Ukrainian armor has been geolocated behind the third and final line of defense near Verbove. If the gap is wide enough, we may start to see some major armor action just in time for the Abrams arriving next week. The Russian army, though still mighty, is beginning to teeter a bit.
        "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

        Comment


        • Originally posted by PLATO View Post
          Back to the war at hand...

          Ukrainian armor has been geolocated behind the third and final line of defense near Verbove. If the gap is wide enough, we may start to see some major armor action just in time for the Abrams arriving next week. The Russian army, though still mighty, is beginning to teeter a bit.
          It's not the third line, it's the third 'layer' of the fist line.
          Indifference is Bliss

          Comment


          • PLATO
            PLATO commented
            Editing a comment
            I stand corrected and Thank You for the clarification.

        • Originally posted by PLATO View Post
          Back to the war at hand...

          Ukrainian armor has been geolocated behind the third and final line of defense near Verbove. If the gap is wide enough, we may start to see some major armor action just in time for the Abrams arriving next week. The Russian army, though still mighty, is beginning to teeter a bit.
          IIRC, these are export Abrams possibly inferior even to the leopards and challengers they've already deployed so I suspect the Abrams will have very little significance.

          Comment


          • a minority of Americans support the war in Ukraine...to protect democracy

            Comment


            • and a minority of Americans are against abortion
              Keep on Civin'
              RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • should they get their way to protect democracy?

                Comment


                • I think Lavrov may have just declared war. I guess there is no point in holding back now.
                  “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                  ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                  Comment


                  • I guess Lavrov is still hurt that people laughed publicly over his Ukraine statements last (?) year
                    Blah

                    Comment


                    • Foreign country told US citizen to commit act of war
                      US citizen said no
                      US Senator demands US citizen be investigated

                      I thought it was illegal for US citizens to conduct foreign policy

                      The people in charge are shameless liars and hypocrites

                      actually the US had sanctions on Crimea so Musk needed permission to extend Starlink to the region of Crimea

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
                        The people in charge are shameless liars and hypocrites
                        ALL POLITICIANS ARE LIAR AND HYPOCRITES
                        Hell, Trump told more lies than any president in recent history.
                        And you are just figuring this out


                        Keep on Civin'
                        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                        Comment


                        • PLATO
                          PLATO commented
                          Editing a comment
                          Correction: Trump GOT CAUGHT telling more lies than any President in recent history (Disclaimer: He probably DID tell more lies, but who can tell given U.S. politicians?). General Fact: If a President is speaking...he/she is probably lying. Trump just isn't a very good liar.

                      • And what does that say about the people who vote for them? I guess it’s OK to support liars as long as they are telling us the lies we want to hear.
                        “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                        ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X