The issue with that story is that, and I remember from when it happened, everyone (in Europe) wanted that corrupt prosecutor gone. If Hunter was asking for the prosecutor to be gone (Which we have no evidence for), so was everyone else, and how can you say that it was corruption for the administration to push for his removal without evidence of that corruption (that not only did Hunter push for it, but that it was Hunter pushing for it and not everyone else pushing for it that caused it to take place)?
JM
JM
Comment