He ran down a list of reasons why the flooding hurts the Russians (and Crimea) and still concludes Russia blew up the dam to prevent a Ukrainian offensive targeting Russia's defenses that are now being flooded. The reservoir being drained was an obstacle that required little protection, the dam break destroys Russian defenses to the south and exposes weak or non-existent defenses to the north. Course it'll be muddy so I dont know how long it will take before it dries out. Why would Russia put all that effort into building defenses down river from the dam only to flood those defenses?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia
Collapse
X
-
They haven't been particularly bright this past year and a half, so you tell me.
Also, only one side has been callous with civilian lives so far. I'll let you guess which one.
As it is, Russia is doing no effort whatsoever to help civilians affected by the flood, while Ukraine is diverting drones it would otherwise be using for the war to supply people staranded (on the Russian-occupied side):
Plus, it will be a while until the empty reservoir is traversable, and the river there isn't going to go anywhere, so it will still mean an opposed major river crossing for Ukraine.Indifference is Bliss
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by N35t0r View PostThey haven't been particularly bright this past year and a half, so you tell me.
Also, only one side has been callous with civilian lives so far. I'll let you guess which one.
As it is, Russia is doing no effort whatsoever to help civilians affected by the flood, while Ukraine is diverting drones it would otherwise be using for the war to supply people staranded (on the Russian-occupied side):
Plus, it will be a while until the empty reservoir is traversable, and the river there isn't going to go anywhere, so it will still mean an opposed major river crossing for Ukraine.
Comment
-
Russia did this to head off a counter offensive...? Why wouldn't they wait for the attack and let Ukraine take ground east of Kherson and then blow the dam? Why even bother building those defenses east of Kherson if the plan was to invite Ukrainian forces into the path of a flood? Does this mean the counter offensive is off?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View PostThe war started in 2014 when Obama sent a Nazi army to attack eastern Ukrainians for not supporting the coup.Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View PostRussia did this to head off a counter offensive...? Why wouldn't they wait for the attack and let Ukraine take ground east of Kherson and then blow the dam? Why even bother building those defenses east of Kherson if the plan was to invite Ukrainian forces into the path of a flood? Does this mean the counter offensive is off?
Russia has also been taking troops away from the Kherson region for the past couple of months to send to more active areas of the front, perhaps they decided that sacrificing empty fortifications was an acceptable tradeoff to shutting off that front for the near future (if not more).
Now minefields have been washed away and spread all over the place, infrastructure destroyed and the river channel completely altered, so any crossing of the lower Dnipro would be considerably harder than it was before (once the reservoir finishes emptying, right now it's downright impossible).
Regarding the dam level, Russia was in control of the dam, so they could have let more water through to avoid it filling up. Late winter snowmelt and spring rains (and the associated mud season) also mean that higher flow rates into the reservoir for the past couple of months are to be expected, not nefarious Ukrainians trying to destroy their own country.Indifference is Bliss
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Ukraine is in a no lose situation. If Russia did it, it's a war crime for both humanitarian and environmental reasons. If Ukraine did it (and it actually helps them), good for them; their internationally recognized sovereignty has been violated and I'm okay with them doing pretty much whatever they can to thwart the unlawful invaders.Founder of The Glory of War, CHAMPIONS OF APOLYTON!!!
'92 & '96 Perot, '00 & '04 Bush, '08 & '12 Obama, '16 Clinton, '20 Biden, '24 Harris
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Okay, according to satellite altimetry data, all other reservoirs upstream from the Kakhovka reservoir are also at high levels (eg: https://dahiti.dgfi.tum.de/en/115/wa...vel-altimetry/ ) , as is the Dnipro where it flows into Ukraine from Belarus.
So either the Ukrainians have been pumping water into the reservoir from somewhere else, it wasn't them.Indifference is Bliss
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
And they blew up their own pipeline... Stop hitting yourself Marcia. I dont have to guess, Ukraine has been shelling civilians for nearly a decade. But thats so nice of them, sending drones to save people. I would expect them to send drones to attack Russian survivors. Russia will need to divert resources to provide that opposition along the river. I dont see the upside for Russia, they've been wanting Ukraine to attack their defenses so a flood wipes them out instead. A Russian general withdrew from Kherson a while back because the dam was a potential target and he knew that could trap his soldiers in the city. One analyst said evidence of surreptitious warning and movement of people might identify whodunit.Reports say Moscow’s forces preventing volunteers from rescuing people in town badly affected after collapse of Nova Kakhovka dam
Also, it's very funny that you think it's ridiculous for Russia to have blown up a pipeline they weren't using, but it makes sense for Ukraine to blow up a dam in their own country.
And in case you haven't been paying attention, Russia has been using missiles and drones to target civilian buildings since the start of the war. The UN estimates less than 4k civilian casualties in the 2014-2022 period (combined pro-separatist and pro-ukranian), whereas they estimate over 9k civilian casualties since the Russian invasion (of which less than 10% were in the separatist territories. But sure, uKrAiNe NaZiS aRe TaRgEtTiNg CiViLiAnS.Indifference is Bliss
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment