Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia
Collapse
X
-
That is no the path you are good at, so we will just crush you and your Western lackeys.
-
And after that he was kissing Kim Chen In in lips saying what a great guy he is. You are afraid of a guy who had just invented a primitive first generation nuke, but at the same time you still honestly believe that you can easily defeat a country with an half of century more advanced nuclear and missile technology than you has.Originally posted by Broken_Erika View PostTrump wanted to Nuke N. Korea and blame it on someone else.........
Who are you, if not idiots and clowns?
Leave a comment:
-
That's an addition to Vietnam and that fact that you didn't just points out that back then you were SANE (because such action would risk WW3 and extermination of humanity), not insane like now.Originally posted by PLATO View Post
No, Nixon wanted to Nuke Syria (when it looked like Israel might fall) not Vietnam. But...HE DIDN't...and that is kinda the point really.
Now you are completely insane and honestly think you can do anything you like and still be safe and sound.
Leave a comment:
-
Blah-blah-blah.Originally posted by PLATO View Post
Speaking of using Nukes. I wouldn't be here without them. Dad was scheduled in the first wave for the invasion of Japan. After the surrender, he was also involved in the dismantling of the Japanese shore defenses. It was obvious that the Marines would have taken horrific losses.
This is an example of when Nukes should be used. The use of nuclear weapons on Japan, while horrific in its own right, saved the lives of literally millions of Japanese and Americans. This is totally different than the type of use you keep spouting off about.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were:
a) An experiment.
b) Demonstration of force to your ally - Soviet Union.
Had Roosevelt was still alive you would never used it, because there was no any military necessity for that - after the enterence of USSR in war vs. Japan (which was YOUR demand at the Potsdam's conference) and the destruction of Quantung army , Japan would have been defeated with conventional arms only.
Leave a comment:
-
Mostly because they know politically, economically, and definitely militarily they are vastly inferior and backwards. They couldn't even manage to run a convoy to Kiev without running out of gas and food because of all the pervasive corruption and incompetence. This nuclear chest beating is the only way to get over their butt hurt.Originally posted by Geronimo View Post
why does Russia constantly refer to its nukes but NATO members, US included hardly ever do?
Very unlikely but my imagination can tackle that. Probability of US annexation or nuclear strike to either? Zero percent. Hell, Mexico might already be pro russian...nobody will care beyond diplomatic noises
You will also notice that Putin himself tapped down on the nuclear talk (which he had been using to destract domestic audiences from the **** show of failure he caused in Ukraine). Peter Zeihan claims intelligence officials told him the US informed Putin they know exactly where he is 24/7 and if he orders any nuke launch against any target world wide then the US would not go after Russia but send a nuke to Putin personally. Thus Putin knows he will be the first to die. Suddenly, Putin lost interest in nuclear threats.
Leave a comment:
-
Ok, so you are going with the lie and deny route even though most countries have evaluated the evidence and has determined Russia has systematically been committing war crimes as a part of state policy under the Putin dictatorship. They also have the FSB running torture and execution centers systematically in the illegally occupied territories.Originally posted by Serb View Post
All the Ukranian information centers, created exactly for the purposing of spreading alike propaganda are happy that you heard their fakes.
Such centers for propaganda are officially parts of Ukranian military and you are just and idiot!
It is sad you are supporting crimes against humanity.
Leave a comment:
-
China has a defensive pact with N>Korea, so if someone attacked them China would be obligated to intervene. But if N.Korea attacked first, China would seal the border and declare neutrality. I.E. Fsck you you're on your own.
-
Nixon must not have wanted to very badly.Originally posted by Serb View Post
Nixon wanted to nuke Vietnam, period! Despite Vietnam was no threat to US.
What is so intersting about that?
You have removed your missiles from Turkey, we have removed our missiles from Cuba + your promise to never invade Cuda again.
...and yes, US promises seem to have some weight.
Leave a comment:
-
why does Russia constantly refer to its nukes but NATO members, US included hardly ever do?Originally posted by Serb View Post
BS. You are the only Nation on Earth who had ever used nukes and you have used it against a country, which had none.
Very unlikely but my imagination can tackle that. Probability of US annexation or nuclear strike to either? Zero percent. Hell, Mexico might already be pro russian...nobody will care beyond diplomatic noisesOriginally posted by Serb View PostIt's you who had initiated a coup on the Russian border.
Imagine for a second Russia installs a pro-Russian regime at Mexico or Canada.
Last edited by Geronimo; January 13, 2023, 17:11.
Leave a comment:
-
Trump wanted to Nuke N. Korea and blame it on someone else.........
Leave a comment:
-
Speaking of using Nukes. I wouldn't be here without them. Dad was scheduled in the first wave for the invasion of Japan. After the surrender, he was also involved in the dismantling of the Japanese shore defenses. It was obvious that the Marines would have taken horrific losses.Originally posted by Serb View PostYou are the only Nation on Earth who have used nukes - fact!
This is an example of when Nukes should be used. The use of nuclear weapons on Japan, while horrific in its own right, saved the lives of literally millions of Japanese and Americans. This is totally different than the type of use you keep spouting off about.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: