Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

[Geronimo]

Oh yeah?
We have crushed the most military capable empires of Europe starting from Rzech Pospolita, Sweden, Napoleonic Frrance, the Ottoman Empire and finishin with Hitler's third Reich. I didn't mention Mongols, because they weren't Europeans. Now you think the empire of Yanks could be a problem for us?
We will just bury you.

Dude...how many empires had the Roman empire destroyed when the upstart Ottomons came for them?

[Dinner]

https://youtu.be/UGZi-F3tz-o

[Serb]

-ABMT -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) -bure bull****, no evidence and no incentive.
- the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INFT) -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons treaty - I'll hear you out on this. I don't agree the US is violating the treaty.
- the Chemical Weapons Convention - At least the US is destroying them properly. Definitely not violating the spirit of the treaty. Lawsuits and nimbyism have made the process excruciatingly slow.
- the Treaty on Open Skies -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the nuclear treaty with Iran - I agree that this was a violation of a signed agreement by Trump that harms international law.

However US behavior on the world stage is demonstrably curtailed by international law.

Balh-blah-blah.

Words, words and words that worth nothing.

[Serb]

NATO was formed because Europe asked the US to defend her

BS!
NATO was formed to attack Russia, years before the Warsaw pact was formed.

[Serb]

Ukraine didn't attack your territory either. North Vietnam did attack a sovereign recognized US ally...South Vietnam however...

Yeah, and the Tonkin incident was never used by USA as a reason for war.

[Serb]

That doesn't sound like a War Gods military record to me.

Oh yeah?
We have crushed the most military capable empires of Europe starting from Rzech Pospolita, Sweden, Napoleonic Frrance, the Ottoman Empire and finishin with Hitler's third Reich. I didn't mention Mongols, because they weren't Europeans. Now you think the empire of Yanks could be a problem for us?
We will just bury you.

[Thoth]

Quantity has a quality all of it's own

[Dinner]

-ABMT -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) -bure bull****, no evidence and no incentive.
- the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INFT) -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons treaty - I'll hear you out on this. I don't agree the US is violating the treaty.
- the Chemical Weapons Convention - At least the US is destroying them properly. Definitely not violating the spirit of the treaty. Lawsuits and nimbyism have made the process excruciatingly slow.
- the Treaty on Open Skies -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the nuclear treaty with Iran - I agree that this was a violation of a signed agreement by Trump that harms international law.

However US behavior on the world stage is demonstrably curtailed by international law.

The supposed Iran treaty was never ratified by Congress so, no, there never was such an agreement. Also the ABMY was legally abandoned after we found out Putin had been breaking it for years

[Geronimo]

You have leveled Vietnamese cities poisoned them with chemical weapons, so didn't change a bit since WW2.

The worse mass murderers of this planed in a entire human history.

Are you on record as claiming the US are worse mass murderers of this planed than the Third Reich? Give us your numbers. Those are probably bull****.

What poisons were deployed in cities in Vietnam? Even agent orange, which was a dangerous herbicide but a laughably ineffective anti-personal weapon for all of its poisonous qualities would have been even less effective than a dirty bomb and was never deployed into non rural areas, especially not cities.

[Geronimo]

This is a lie!
USSR had never have a concept of "firestorm" bombing to intentionally destroy cities and have never build strategic bombers for that concept.
We've builded airplanes of battlefield, you have builded airplanes for mass murdering.

You can't name a single fact of Soviet bombings like Dresden.



This is another lie!
Unlike your Ukrainian Nazi puppets we do not aim civilian targets.

You can't name a single city which was intentionally destroyed by us like you have leveled Fallujah. You have leveled it to the ground intentionally, just like many other Iraq cities. You've never cared about civilians there, because they are not humans for you at all, just ragheads.

bull****. As assessed by compensation claims 10,000 of Fallujah's (population 400,000) homes were beyond repair and another 19,000 were assessed to be damaged but repairable. If that fits the definition of "levelled" then Russia has "levelled" an enormous number of Ukrainian and Syrian towns and cities. Including:

Mariupol at 90% damaged or destroyed (population 426,000)

[Geronimo]

Your American word weights NOTHING!!!

And you have clearly demonstrated that to the rest of the World during the last 30 years.
You have broken, rapped and annihilated the international law by all possible means you like during that period. You have destroyed the whole conception of the international law and now want to substitute it with some kind of mysterious "rules" known only to you and your Western lackeys.

Not to mention all your illegal wars of agression, your every new administration claims that it has no responsibility for the treaties the previous one have signed and sees nothing wrong with that!

You have broken all possible internetional agreements you have signed from the climate change and free trade to the key strategical agreements about World's security and peace.
Just a few example of key strategic agreements you have broken:
- the Anti-ballistic missile treaty (ABMT)
- the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC)
- the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INFT)
- the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons treaty (NPT)
- the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)
- the Treaty on Open Skies
- the nuclear treaty with Iran

Your word is NOTHING, Americans!
Absolutely NOTHING!!!

-ABMT -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) -bure bull****, no evidence and no incentive.
- the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INFT) -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons treaty - I'll hear you out on this. I don't agree the US is violating the treaty.
- the Chemical Weapons Convention - At least the US is destroying them properly. Definitely not violating the spirit of the treaty. Lawsuits and nimbyism have made the process excruciatingly slow.
- the Treaty on Open Skies -had a legal mechanism to leave
- the nuclear treaty with Iran - I agree that this was a violation of a signed agreement by Trump that harms international law.

However US behavior on the world stage is demonstrably curtailed by international law.

[Bereta_Eder]

NATO was formed because Europe asked the US to defend her

[Bereta_Eder]

Europe wanted the US to defend its ass

[Bereta_Eder]

I don't know.
Maybe I'm taken aback by the US DECENCY in some matters

but will have to say that


do you know who wanted NATO?


Not the US. could'nt care less


the europeans wanted NATO with the US at its lead


true



you can't complain about a hegemony YOU wanted,,,,,

[Geronimo]

Vietnam didn't attack your territory

Ukraine didn't attack your territory either. North Vietnam did attack a sovereign recognized US ally...South Vietnam however...