Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post

    Care to count how many wars we have won for the same period?
    that's reasonable.

    from The Livonian War starting in 1558 to present counting all foreign armed conflicts and excluding rebellions that didn't draw in a foreign power, I count a total of 107 conflicts. Of these Russia won I count that Russia won at least 64 wars out of 102 concluded wars over that time. I was quite generous in giving credit to multiple theater wins which could be construed as separate wars such assigning multiple ww2 and aftermath related wins and wins against revolts where a foreign power intervened against Russia as well as to conflicts Russia barely participated in and were won overwhelmingly by allies. By the same standards Russia seems to have lost 19 wars and had unfavorable results mixed with some lesser favorable results in 19 more.

    That doesn't sound like a War Gods military record to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied
    They have killed more their own civilians with their incompetent attempts to shot down our missiles.
    Hell, they have even managed to kill two Polish peasants in Poland with their SAM launched from Ukraine!
    Their are complete untrained degenerates.
    Last edited by Serb; January 14, 2023, 04:54.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied

    Keep repeating Ukranian propaganda, Kiev Bob!

    If our missiles were shot down, why they are begging for electricity generators?

    Leave a comment:


  • EPW
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post
    With nearly zero civilian casualities.
    Sure buddy You're right that the attacks have been largely ineffective (the rockets were shot down), but many of the ones that have made it through have killed scores of civilians.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied
    With nearly zero civilian casualities.

    Leave a comment:


  • EPW
    replied
    Unlike your Ukrainian Nazi puppets we do not aim civilian targets
    Brah, you've literally and recently bragged about Russia targeting infrastructure in Kyiv with rocket attacks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied
    You have leveled Vietnamese cities poisoned them with chemical weapons, so didn't change a bit since WW2.

    The worse mass murderers of this planet in a entire human history.
    Last edited by Serb; January 15, 2023, 13:17.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied
    Originally posted by Dinner View Post

    The USWR also mass bombed and bombarded cities full of civilians. People in glass houses and all that.
    This is a lie!
    USSR had never have a concept of "firestorm" bombing to intentionally destroy cities and have never build strategic bombers for that concept.
    We've builded airplanes of battlefield, you have builded airplanes for mass murdering.

    You can't name a single fact of Soviet bombings like Dresden.

    Hell, today Russia continues to deliberately target civilians as official government policy against all the laws of war.
    This is another lie!
    Unlike your Ukrainian Nazi puppets we do not aim civilian targets.

    You can't name a single city which was intentionally destroyed by us like you have leveled Fallujah. You have leveled it to the ground intentionally, just like many other Iraq cities. You've never cared about civilians there, because they are not humans for you at all, just ragheads.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post

    I've heard this BS a hundred of times before.

    The fact is that mass murdering of civilians was a normal practice in WW2 for Americans and British. You have incinerated millions of civilians with your firestorms. You have destroyed German and Japanese cities, burned millions alive and see nothing wrong with that. So, using nukes against a nearly defeated Japan for you was no a moral dilema at all - you have killed over 250 000 civilians in bombing of Tokyo - more then you have slain with nukes at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    So you can keep your whitewashing BS about saving lives for yourselves and your Japanese lackeys (who doesn't know now whom have dropped nukes on them, thanks to your "education").

    That was both an experiment and a demonstration of force for you, nothing else.
    The USWR also mass bombed and bombarded cities full of civilians. People in glass houses and all that. Hell, today Russia continues to deliberately target civilians as official government policy against all the laws of war.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied
    You are mass murderers and always have been.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied
    Originally posted by Dinner View Post

    The best estimates at the time was that invading the Japanese home islands would cost 1 million casualties. So, yes, they were going to get used to avoid such loses.
    I've heard this BS a hundred of times before.

    The fact is that mass murdering of civilians was a normal practice in WW2 for Americans and British. You have incinerated millions of civilians with your firestorms. You have destroyed German and Japanese cities, burned millions alive and see nothing wrong with that. So, using nukes against a nearly defeated Japan for you was no a moral dilema at all - you have killed over 250 000 civilians in bombing of Tokyo - more then you have slain with nukes at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    So you can keep your whitewashing BS about saving lives for yourselves and your Japanese lackeys (who doesn't know now whom have dropped nukes on them, thanks to your "education").

    That was both an experiment and a demonstration of force for you, nothing else.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post

    Blah-blah-blah.

    Hiroshima and Nagasaki were:
    a) An experiment.
    b) Demonstration of force to your ally - Soviet Union.


    Had Roosevelt was still alive you would never used it, because there was no any military necessity for that - after the enterence of USSR in war vs. Japan (which was YOUR demand at the Potsdam's conference) and the destruction of Quantung army , Japan would have been defeated with conventional arms only.
    The best estimates at the time was that invading the Japanese home islands would cost 1 million casualties. So, yes, they were going to get used to avoid such loses.

    Leave a comment:


  • Broken_Erika
    commented on 's reply
    Calling Trump an Idiot or Clown is Insulting to Idiots and Clowns.

  • Serb
    replied
    Originally posted by Geronimo View Post

    Nixon must not have wanted to very badly.

    ...and yes, US promises seem to have some weight.


    Your American word weights NOTHING!!!

    And you have clearly demonstrated that to the rest of the World during the last 30 years.
    You have broken, rapped and annihilated the international law by all possible means you like during that period. You have destroyed the whole conception of the international law and now want to substitute it with some kind of mysterious "rules" known only to you and your Western lackeys.

    Not to mention all your illegal wars of agression, your every new administration claims that it has no responsibility for the treaties the previous one have signed and sees nothing wrong with that!

    You have broken all possible internetional agreements you have signed from the climate change and free trade to the key strategical agreements about World's security and peace.
    Just a few example of key strategic agreements you have broken:
    - the Anti-ballistic missile treaty (ABMT)
    - the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC)
    - the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INFT)
    - the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons treaty (NPT)
    -
    the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)
    - the Treaty on Open Skies
    - the nuclear treaty with Iran

    Your word is NOTHING, Americans!
    Absolutely NOTHING!!!

    Last edited by Serb; January 13, 2023, 23:01.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied
    Originally posted by PLATO View Post

    So what? China probably wants to Nuke North Korea.
    In your wet dreams only.

    It's a pain in the a$$ to everyone.
    You are the pain in the ass to everyone and the sole reason why NK has nukes now, because you have demonstrated very well to the rest of the World what you do with the ones whom you proclaim as your enemy, if he doesn't have nukes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X