Who do you tip to win the US presidential election

[Kidlicious]

You PROMISE
What is it you say, NO FACTS IN EVIDENCE


I guess we should all believe you instead of... the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or Trumps own Justice Department, or Republican officials in many states
Yeah... RIGHT

You believe there is no fraud WITHOUT EVIDENCE.

[Ming]

Where is your evidence that there was?
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Trumps own Justice Department, and Republican officials in many states say there wasn't.
And after a full month after the election, Trump and his clown show have come up with NADA.
But keep giving more money to Trump... he loves it.

[Kidlicious]

The statistics indicate that there was fraud.

At any rate, stop falsely claiming that Trump Team has had every opportunity to prove their case, and stop dishonesty saying that there is no proof, because it's up to the officials to let people investigate.

[Ming]

"somebodies" opinion of statistics are just that... opinions, and proof of NOTHING.

It reminds of this...
"There are several undeniable truths about statistics:
First and foremost, they can be manipulated, massaged and misstated. In the immortal words of Homer Simpson, “Aw, you can come up with statistics to prove anything … Forty percent of all people know that.”
Second, if bogus statistical information is repeated often enough, it eventually is considered to be true.

Trump and his legal team have become a total clown show... with Trump appointed judges throwing them out on a regular basis. They have turned up NADA and it's doubtful they ever will.
But Trump loves his cult following because they always believe his lies.

[Kidlicious]

Just saying that you can lie with statistics isn't a real argument.

[Ming]

Having no proof or evidence isn't much of an argument either...

[Kidlicious]

Having no proof or evidence isn't much of an argument either...

Another fake argument

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...lection_.html#!

[Ming]

Let's see...
"he believes... He thinks...
I would have never ever have...
I believe"
In other words, an opinion, based on HIS personal view of some data...
Nothing more, nothing less, JUST an opinion.

Talk about fake argument... where is there actual PROOF or EVIDENCE...
Try again...

[pchang]

Communist Kid + drug addict wife + horrible divorce => Misogynist, deranged Trump supporter Kid
Reasonable Lancer + ??? => Deranged Trump supporter Lancer

[-Jrabbit]

Today is safe harbor day, when electors are locked in for all certifying states.

The GOP and Team Trump have now had over a month to come up with evidence of fraud. And yet...nothing, nada. All they've accomplished is being repeatedly laughed out of court (losing 49 out of 50 lawsuits so far) and being ignored by patriotic GOP legislatures. When you think about the 4 years they've had to prepare for this, it's truly pathetic. It's also excellent circumstantial evidence that there was no substantial election fraud.

Pleas try to remember: vote-counting is not a Dem operation. Poll workers and vote counters are split between the two major parties, keeping an eye on each other to ensure accuracy. It's a fundamentally fair process at its core.

The fact that Trump lost so convincingly and yet the Senate did not get flipped and the GOP actually gained seats in the House is all evidence of a normal election, where the will of the people is reflected in the results.

[Kidlicious]

Communist Kid + drug addict wife + horrible divorce => Misogynist, deranged Trump supporter Kid
Reasonable Lancer + ??? => Deranged Trump supporter Lancer

You're such a creep

[Kidlicious]

Let's see...
"he believes... He thinks...
I would have never ever have...
I believe"
In other words, an opinion, based on HIS personal view of some data...
Nothing more, nothing less, JUST an opinion.

Talk about fake argument... where is there actual PROOF or EVIDENCE...
Try again...

It's called an EXPERT OPINION BASED ON THE DATA.

[-Jrabbit]

An expert opinion is still just an opinion. Whether the opinion is based on facts or fantasy is immaterial.

"They must have done something bad" is not evidence.

[Kidlicious]

An expert opinion is still just an opinion.

Flat out wrong.

[-Jrabbit]

That's just your opinion. Hypothetical for you: So what do you do when two experts with identical backgrounds, looking at the same data, disagree? Sounds like you just want to pick the one who agrees with you.

[Ming]

Just because you call somebody an "expert" does mean they are correct. We've already seen other of your "expert" witnesses get laughed out of court by Judges appointed by Trump.