Who do you tip to win the US presidential election

[Kidlicious]

She and others are being sued by the software company because her theories and claims have not only been not proven but are totally false and silly... and she has not proved a damn thing in court to back up her stupid crack pot claims...



She has PROVEN none of that... she has failed big time in court EVERY TIME.
(as of point two... she didn't prove that, and while there is some proof that that people have tried, she has provided NO PROOF that they have done so in such a way to provide the massive fraud she and Trump continue to claim in this election)
But keep drinking the kool-aid, because you are the one that pwns yourself with every post.

Your opinions are not evidence based. Her evidence has not been debunked by Dominion or anyone in court

[Kidlicious]

The Judge's ruling was she filed an invalid claim, in the wrong court, at the wrong time, for the wrong plaintiff. Nailed it!

https://www.scribd.com/document/487229324/Judge-Linda-Parker-Dec-7-2020-ruling#from_embed

IOW, not debunked

[-Jrabbit]

IOW, incompetent lawyer.

[Ming]

HER opinions are not evidence based. Her evidence has NOT been proven in court
Until they are, they are just crazy conspiracy theories and NOT fact.

[Kidlicious]

HER opinions are not evidence based. Her evidence has NOT been proven in court
Until they are, they are just crazy conspiracy theories and NOT fact.

You didn't look at the documents she's provided. You haven't read the affidavits etc... You're just repeating what you've been told. You can't call someone crazy without debunking their case which you haven't done, and either have those people that gave you kool-aid.

[Ming]

She has to prove her crazy ass theories... and she has totally failed MULTIPLE times in court.
Her past documents and affidavits have been full of errors and been laughed out of court.
So until she actually proves something, she has nothing.

[Kidlicious]

No. You have to debunk her case. Stop setting false goal posts.

[Ming]

No... you have to PROVE something. I don't have to debunk anything.

[Kidlicious]

Yes you do because she has the receipts.

[Ming]

Uhhh... she has PROVEN NOTHING. When she actually does, let us know.

[Kidlicious]

Uhhh... she has PROVEN NOTHING. When she actually does, let us know.

Again, you haven't read her case. You're just saying things because they sound good to you.

[Ming]

Has she proven ANYTHING YET?
Until she does..... she has nothing.

[Kidlicious]

It's for each person to look at for themselves and make their own decision. Everyone that isn't corrupt will do so.

[Ming]

She has had "witnesses, documents, evidence and affidavits" before... and you have fallen for it every time. She has proven NOTHING.
Until she does...

[Kidlicious]

You fall for the "safe and secure election" con. Even Democrats said that foreign governments can hack the machines before the election

[Ming]

Can they... maybe.. Did they... PROVE IT
So far, all the lame attempts have failed.