Tweet
Originally posted by Ming
View Post
-
Was not a secure systemI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -
Trumps own Cyber Security Group disagrees with you...
They found no evidence... and neither has anybody else that has stood up in court.
And Trumps Justice Department disagrees with you as well... no evidence.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
They let the attack happen.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
And the attack happened AFTER the election, so again, what does this have to do with anything...Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
So I will ask once again, where is there ANY ACTUAL evidence that shows massive fraud that wasn't laughed out of court by Republican judges...Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
And another one BITES THE DUST
Wisconsin Supreme Court Ends Another One of Trump’s Lawsuits on Day Electoral College Finalizes Defeat
Not only rejected, but slapped down hard.Hours before electors across the country will make President-elect Joe Biden’s victory official, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s majority torched the outgoing administration’s last-ditch attempt to overthrow the will of the people.
“Our laws allow the challenge flag to be thrown regarding various aspects of election administration,” conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote in a 20-page majority opinion. “The challenges raised by the Campaign in this case, however, come long after the last play or even the last game; the Campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began. Election claims of this type must be brought expeditiously. The Campaign waited until after the election to raise selective challenges that could have been raised long before the election.”
On Saturday, the high court’s liberal wing and a conservative justice joining them tipped their hands in a brutal hearing that dressed down outgoing President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence’s lawsuit as racist and anti-democratic.
Justice Jill Karofsky, an ultramarathon runner who won a landslide election this year to her post, tore into the lame-duck administration’s attorney James Troupis for suing only the two Wisconsin counties where the most Black people live: Milwaukee and Dane.
“This lawsuit, Mr. Troupis, smacks of racism,” Karofsky declared.
She was not alone in that assessment, with Justice Rebecca Dallet pointing out that Trump glossed over the state’s other 72 counties to target exclusively the “most non-white, urban” areas.
As Dallet noted, the unequal treatment was all the more flagrant because the campaign had challenged the use of a form common throughout Wisconsin.
“You’re not asking us to throw out votes in any other counties that use that form,” she added.
Karofsky and Dallet joined together in a concurring opinion to emphasize the failure of Trump’s fraud claims.
“As acknowledged by the President’s counsel at oral argument, the President would have the people of this country believe that fraud took place in Wisconsin during the November 3 ,2020 election,” they noted. “Nothing could be further from the truth. The President failed to point to even one vote cast in this election by an ineligible voter; yet he asks this court to disenfranchise over 220,000 voters. The circuit court, whose decision we affirm, found no evidence of any fraud.”
“The evidence does show that, despite a global pandemic, more than 3.2 million Wisconsinites performed their civic duty. More importantly as it relates to this lawsuit, these voters followed the rules that were in place at the time. To borrow Justice Hagedorn’s metaphor, Wisconsin voters complied with the election rulebook. No penalties were committed and the final score was the result of a free and fair election.”
And this is typical of most of Trump's challenges...
TRUMP LOSES YET AGAIN.
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Worryingly, a 4-3 ruling.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
But one of the conservatives went along, and the language of the ruling pretty much sums up Trumps entire efforts with his BS.
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
https://kfor.com/news/far-right-grou...k-dc-churches/Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
There’s only about 100 news articles on it. As I suspected, you know you come in bad faith and cherry pick information and don’t care if it’s real or not. Your previous post was bragging about them. So which one is it?
The whole capital is flooded with white supremacists. This is cross burning level racism.
Will you condemn racist violence?Last edited by Ted Striker; December 14, 2020, 14:40.We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham LincolnComment
-
I condemn you.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Will you condemn racism? Yes or no.We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham LincolnComment
-
Do you condemn election fraud?I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Yes I do, no matter who it happens to, even Trump. However, over 60 court cases have found no evidence of fraud.
I answered the question in good faith.
Now your turn. Will you answer the biggest soft ball question of all time?
Will you condemn racist violence? Yes or no.We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham LincolnComment
Comment