Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Mueller Investigation.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I'm just going to ignore you from now on since you can't honor a reasonable request.
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • III. Documenting the “Purge”
      A. FOIA Lawsuit Record Production
      In June 2013, as a result of its lawsuit, Judicial Watch obtained and released
      hundreds of pages of FBI records revealing that, in 2012, the agency purged its anti-
      terrorism training curricula of material determined by a group of “Subject Matter
      Experts” to be “offensive” to Muslims.9 The FBI refused to disclose the identities of
      these “Subject Matter Experts.” The excised material included references linking the
      Muslim Brotherhood to terrorism, tying al Qaeda to the 1993 World Trade Center
      and Khobar Towers bombings, and suggesting that “young male immigrants of
      Middle Eastern appearance … may fit the terrorist profile best.”
      Among the records produced is an FBI policy document, “Guiding Principles:
      Touchstone Document on Training,” which provided the rationale for the
      curriculum purge. The “Touchstone” document contains an extraordinary
      statement: “Mere association with organizations that demonstrate both legitimate
      (advocacy) and illicit (violent extremism) objectives should not automatically result
      in a determination that the associated individual is acting in furtherance of the
      organization’s illicit objective(s).” Perhaps not “automatically,” but it should
      definitely result in a preliminary inquiry and some fundamental investigative work.
      B. Outside groups and purge pressure
      The FBI should not “outsource” its counterterrorism training to the terrorists
      and/or their agents of influence who have sworn to destroy our country. The
      Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) has lobbied successfully for years to remove
      references to Islam, sharia and jihad from the national security dialogue and
      terminology of law enforcement, intelligence and defense agencies – even though
      terrorists from AQ to Hamas use those terms and Quranic doctrine and quotes to
      justify their operations and attacks.
      In 2005, MPAC founder Salam al-Marayati made the following public
      statement at an Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) conference in Dallas:
      "Counter-terrorism and counter-violence should be
      defined by us," he said. "We should define how an effective
      counter-terrorism policy should be pursued in this
      country. So, number one, we reject any effort, notion,
      suggestion that Muslims should start spying on one
      Judicial Watch report
      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

      Comment


      • Typical Kidiot... he keeps getting schooled, and his response.
        I'm just going to ignore you from now on


        And then he finishes with
        since you can't honor a reasonable request
        This coming from somebody who NEVER responds to the "reasonable request" of actually quoting where another poster said whatever he made up they said...

        Thanks for playing
        Keep on Civin'
        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • Not once when he has accused me of saying something did he ever back it up with an actual quote.

          But when people quote him to back up their claims he calls them liars. It's just too hilarious.

          What a loser. He wastes his time here thinking he's successfully trolling us while everyone is just laughing at his feeble attempts.

          There must be a troll school somewhere that you could get an education from. Search harder.
          It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
          RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

          Comment


          • I get more reliable news from Russian bot than the WaPo.
            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

            Comment


            • -Jrabbit
              -Jrabbit commented
              Editing a comment
              I have no doubt that Russian bots are the source of a substantial part of your current worldview.

            • Kidlicious
              Kidlicious commented
              Editing a comment
              Take your tinfoil hat off and stop watching fake news.

          • Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
            I get more reliable news from Russian bot than the WaPo.
            And if that's what you think, you are even a bigger fool than we have been led to believe (if that was even possible)


            Keep on Civin'
            RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment


            • Voters don't believe that Dems have any proof of collusion and no basis for impeachment for such.

              Most voters say Democrats have yet to prove a convincing case tying President Trump to Russian meddling in the 2016 elections, according to a new poll being released Tuesday.
              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

              Comment


              • Kidlicious
                Kidlicious commented
                Editing a comment
                53% said it's a political ploy

              • -Jrabbit
                -Jrabbit commented
                Editing a comment
                Ooh, a poll from Washington Times!

                This is the publication founded by Sun Myung Moon, and is known for supporting neo-confederates and white supremaciism, promoting the Obama-Kenya-Muslim lie, promoting the Seth Rich conspiracy theory (settled out of court, forced to issue retraction), are major climate change deniers, etc.

                And they could only muster 53%?? LOL, pretty pathetic, considering their audience.

            • We'll see if those numbers change when the results of the investigation are actually released. Right now it's all based on speculations.

              I'll wait for the facts to be released but must admit that the number of those convicted is quite impressive.
              It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
              RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • Dossier= Conspiracy theory proven false. Let's see if Dinner keeps peddling that horse****.
                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                Comment


                • Show us the proof
                  Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
                  Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

                    Seriously dude. This is stupid. Presidential pardon is a part of our system.
                    It may be legal, but nevertheless, it is an abuse of power if the PotUS (ab)uses his pardoning power in order to influence witnesses in an investigation, not to give testimony against him.

                    It is just like Gerrymandering and hand tailoring voting restrictions so that certain minorities are excluded from voting.
                    Both can be made so that they are legal ... but both are abuses of power.

                    And all 3 are indications of a broken system (at least in nowadays world)
                    Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
                    Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Proteus_MST View Post

                      It may be legal, but nevertheless, it is an abuse of power if the PotUS (ab)uses his pardoning power in order to influence witnesses in an investigation, not to give testimony against him.

                      It is just like Gerrymandering and hand tailoring voting restrictions so that certain minorities are excluded from voting.
                      Both can be made so that they are legal ... but both are abuses of power.

                      And all 3 are indications of a broken system (at least in nowadays world)
                      No it isn't. It isn't even unethical. You're stupid.
                      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                      Comment


                      • There is no abuse of the pardoning power. Stop repeating ridiculous crap.
                        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Proteus_MST View Post
                          Show us the proof
                          Even Michael Isikoff is saying it's fake now. Steele himself said under oath that it was created to challenge the outcome of an election. Cohen said under oath that he was never in Prague, and that no one in the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.
                          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                          Comment


                          • President Trump never misses a chance to deny the claims made in the document known as the Steele dossier, but special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is proving some of the details contained inside to be true. CNN’s Tom Foreman reports.


                            Here is the reality: Not a single part of the Steele dossier has been disproved while the majority of it has been proven correct. Fact.
                            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X