The Mueller Investigation.

[Kidlicious]

One can only hope that the Mueller investigation, when finished, will lead to a significant decrease in the abuse of power and government corruption

Yeah, if he gets fired and the media reports on his abuse of power like they are supposed to. But the media can't do that because they are co-conspirators now.

[Proteus_MST]

Yeah, if he gets fired and the media reports on his abuse of power like they are supposed to. But the media can't do that because they are co-conspirators now.

If with "he" you mean Trump and with "the media" you mean Fox-News, I agree

[Jon Miller]

washingtonpost.com/busine...

I hope you are being paid.

JM

[Kidlicious]

If with "he" you mean Trump and with "the media" you mean Fox-News, I agree

How did Trump abuse power, and how is Fox a co-conspirator?

[Kidlicious]

washingtonpost.com/busine...

I hope you are being paid.

JM

Seriously accusing me of being a Russian agent or is this how you debate?

[Kidlicious]

Ironically that piece in WaPo is blatant disinformation.

[Ming]

Kidiot says...
Any headline that supports my point of view is fact, even if it's simply an opinion
Any factual news story that doesn't go along with my point of view is fake news or disinformation

And no, Kidiot shouldn't be on the payroll... because he sucks at it

[Kidlicious]

Kidiot says...
Any headline that supports my point of view is fact, even if it's simply an opinion
Any factual news story that doesn't go along with my point of view is fake news or disinformation

And no, Kidiot shouldn't be on the payroll... because he sucks at it

No. There is 100x more fake news on the internets about Trump. I've proven that. But where is the WaPo piece on that? There's isn't one because they put out fake news. The fact is that they aren't reporting facts about the Mueller investigation. And you are stupid enough to take a piece about Russian disinformation seriously and believe that all of those that say anything bad about Mueller is a Russian.

[Kidlicious]

...

Russia Special Counsel Mueller Worked with Radical Islamist Groups to Purge Anti-Terrorism Training Material Offensive to Muslims


MAY 18, 2017

Now that Robert Mueller has been appointed special counsel to investigate if Russia influenced the 2016 presidential election it’s worth reiterating his misguided handiwork and collaboration with radical Islamist organizations as FBI director. Judicial Watch exclusively obtained droves of records back in 2013 documenting how, under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI purged all anti-terrorism training material deemed “offensive” to Muslims after secret meetings between Islamic organizations and the FBI chief. Judicial Watch had to sue to get the records and published an in-depth report on the scandal in 2013 and a lengthier, updated follow-up in 2015.

As FBI director, Mueller bent over backwards to please radical Islamist groups and caved into their demands. The agency eliminated the valuable anti-terrorism training material and curricula after Mueller met with various Islamist organizations, including those with documented ties too terrorism. Among them were two organizations— Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—named by the U.S. government as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorist financing case. CAIR is a terrorist front group with extensive links to foreign and domestic Islamists. It was founded in 1994 by three Middle Eastern extremists (Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad and Rafeeq Jaber) who ran the American propaganda wing of Hamas, known then as the Islamic Association for Palestine.

The records obtained as part of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit show that Mueller, who served 12 years as FBI chief, met with the Islamist organizations on February 8, 2012 to hear their demands. Shortly later the director assured the Muslim groups that he had ordered the removal of presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices nationwide. The purge was part of a broader Islamist operation designed to influence the opinions and actions of persons, institutions, governments and the public at-large. The records obtained by Judicial Watch also show similar incidents of Islamic influence operations at the Departments of Justice and State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Obama White House.

Here are some of the reasons provided by Mueller’s FBI for getting rid of “offensive” training documents: “Article is highly inflammatory and inaccurately argues the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization.” It’s crucial to note that Mueller himself had previously described the Muslim Brotherhood as a group that supports terrorism in the U.S. and overseas when his agency provided this ludicrous explanation. Here’s more training material that offended the terrorist groups, according to the FBI files provided to Judicial Watch: An article claiming Al Qaeda is “clearly linked” to the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing; The Qur’an is not the teachings of the Prophet, but the revealed word of God; Sweeping generality of ‘Those who fit the terrorist profile best (for the present at least) are young male immigrants of Middle Eastern appearance;’ conflating Islamic Militancy with terrorism. The list goes on and on.

Mueller’s actions have had a widespread effect because many local law enforcement agencies followed the FBI’s lead in allowing Islamic groups like CAIR to dictate what anti-terrorism material could be used to train officers. Among them are police departments in three Illinois cities— Lombard, Elmhurst and Highland Park—as well as the New York Police Department (NYPD). In the case of the Lombard Police Department, CAIR asserted that the instructor of a training course called “Islamic Awareness as a Counter-Terrorist Strategy” was anti-Muslim though there was no evidence to support it. Like the FBI, Lombard officials got rid of the “offensive” course. The NYPD purged a highly-acclaimed report that’s proven to be a critical tool in terrorism investigations after three New York Muslims, two mosques and an Islamic nonprofit filed a lawsuit.

Considering Mueller’s role in much of this, it makes him a bizarre choice to lead the heated Russia investigation. The goal, apparently, is to determine of Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election and if President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russian officials. In the Justice Department announcement, Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein describes Mueller as person who qualifies to lead the probe because he exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command. “Special Counsel Mueller will have all appropriate resources to conduct a thorough and complete investigation, and I am confident that he will follow the facts, apply the law and reach a just result,” according to Rosenstein.

Mueller allies appear to be accusing Judicial Watch of being Russians

[-Jrabbit]

From May, 2017, when Mueller was appointed. His selection was widely hailed by the GOP.

You could look it up.

[Proteus_MST]

How did Trump abuse power, and how is Fox a co-conspirator?

Depends on who you ask.
Here some examples:
Trumps suggestion he could pardon Manafort (witness tampering -> obstruction of justice)
Trumps tweets about the free press being traitors/enemies of the people (attack on the 1st amendment)
Trump publicly praising Stone as someone who would never testify against him (Again witness tampering)

[Ming]

Yawn... More Kidiot rants that anything negative about Trump is fake news and only pro Trump opinions, made up stories, and other crap is real news.

And you are stupid enough to take a piece about Russian disinformation seriously and believe that all of those that say anything bad about Mueller is a Russian.

And as usual, your moronic debate style where you make up crap, insinuating that another poster said something or believes something that wasn't said by them is childish at best

But I guess you really have not choice but to make stuff up since you keep getting schooled when it comes to actual facts

Thanks for playing

[Kidlicious]

Depends on who you ask.
Here some examples:
Trumps suggestion he could pardon Manafort (witness tampering -> obstruction of justice)
Trumps tweets about the free press being traitors/enemies of the people (attack on the 1st amendment)
Trump publicly praising Stone as someone who would never testify against him (Again witness tampering)

Seriously dude. This is stupid. Presidential pardon is a part of our system.

[Kidlicious]

Yawn... More Kidiot rants that anything negative about Trump is fake news and only pro Trump opinions, made up stories, and other crap is real news.


And as usual, your moronic debate style where you make up crap, insinuating that another poster said something or believes something that wasn't said by them is childish at best

But I guess you really have not choice but to make stuff up since you keep getting schooled when it comes to actual facts

Thanks for playing

Try posting without lying about me and my argument. See if you can.

[Kidlicious]

Here's some facts. CAIR is an Islamist group. Mueller met with them. They lobbied him to get FBI policy and agent training changed. The FBI made the requested changes. Judicial Watch requested the documents relating to this which is their right according to FOIA. The FBI refused to turn over those docs, an abuse of power. Judicial Watch sued for the docs and won. Now Mueller allies in the media are insinuating that Judicial Watch is paid for by the Kemlin, which is fake news.

[-Jrabbit]

None of that has anything to do with the investigation.

Focus, Kid, focus.

[Kidlicious]

Yes it does. It shows that the investigators are corrupt and that the media is conspiring with them to confuse the public about the investigation.

[Ming]

Try posting without lying about me and my argument. See if you can.

Gee... let's see about that charge of lying
You do indeed claim most news sources that post anti Trump stuff are FAKE NEWS or disinformation - FACT
You do indeed claim most news sources that are pro Trump are REAL NEWS - FACT
You do quote headlines from Alt Right sources that are opinions - FACT
You do quote "news" from Alt Right sources that aren't supported by any facts - FACT
You do quote headlines from sources that don't support that headline with the actual story (which you probably didn't even read) - FACT
You do just make up stuff about what other posts say or think, but can NEVER QUOTE where the other poster actually said what you claim - FACT

Thanks for playing...