Oy Poor Roy Moore

[Kidlicious]

Liberals:








https://twitter.com/Vickybayless/sta...05550239289345

Some other things for liberals to be proud of...

intolerance of minority view points on college campuses
riots
drugs
STDs
Vagina hats
Cop killing
political correctness (That's racist!)
Broken families
Teenage pregnancy
abortion
Protesting against National Anthem
Forcing citizens to make cakes
The Deep State
Fake News
Trump Derangement Syndrome

[Proteus_MST]

Uh, you might want to check that roll call of the VRA. Republicans supported it. Democrats opposed it.

It doesn't say anything about Democrats vs. Republicans but about Liberals vs. Conservatives.
That the Democrats are known to be "the party of the social-liberals" and the Republicans as "the party od the conservatives" is a development that only manifested after the first half of the 20th century

[Proteus_MST]

Ironically you are paranoid like Stalin

Says the person who sees in the Mueller investigation a conspiracy of the democrats, likewise in Moore getting accused of dating minors in his 30s

[Berzerker]

IIRC 16 at the time when Moore was said to be hitting on teens.
Trying to engage in sexual acitities with a 14 years old girl (which was the age of his main acccuser at the tie he suposedly tried to engage in Petting with her) would definitely have been illegal

Didn't he try to get her to give him a blow job? Isn't that sodomy? Uh oh... Now, why anyone would think God destroyed Sodom because of a blow job is another matter, but it was Roy's dick that was hanging out there for a 14 year old to service. Ted Nugent apparently got a hummer from Courtney Love when she very young.

[-Jrabbit]

Alabama sodomy law: https://www.huntsvilledefenselawyer....ama-afraid-ask

[Proteus_MST]

IIRC she already stopped him wen he tried to get her to perform a simple handjob

[Berzerker]

How did Moore avoid the girls' fathers? I find that quite curious. Was he using his position in the judicial system to investigate the families of the girls and picking out single mothers? Its strange Moore said he asked the mothers' permission. I cant imagine all his 'dates' had single mothers, but his comment suggests fathers weren't even a concern for him.

[Berzerker]

IIRC she already stopped him wen he tried to get her to perform a simple handjob

yeah, but he wasn't gonna be happy with just a hand job - methinks he's a sodomite too...

[Berzerker]

How did Moore avoid the girls' fathers? I find that quite curious. Was he using his position in the judicial system to investigate the families of the girls and picking out single mothers? Its strange Moore said he asked the mothers' permission. I cant imagine all his 'dates' had single mothers, but his comment suggests fathers weren't even a concern for him.

Hmm...just remembered he went for the 14 year old at a custody hearing, so mom was single

[Ben Kenobi]

It doesn't say anything about Democrats vs. Republicans but about Liberals vs. Conservatives

Well, then. Where's the evidence that conservatives voted against the VRA?

That the Democrats are known to be "the party of the social-liberals" and the Republicans as "the party od the conservatives" is a development that only manifested after the first half of the 20th century

Ah. That old chestnut. You are aware that the Conservative party is much older than Democrats and Republicans, no?

[-Jrabbit]

LOL

Why am I not surprised to see JR clinging to the case as if there was some substance to it? She admitted that she forged Roy Moore's signature. This is over.

Next time maybe hire some higher priced talent if you're trying to smear a Republican.

Admitted forging his signature? Cite/link, please. Here's my source:

During a press conference in Atlanta on Friday, Nelson and Allred stood by their claim that Moore himself inscribed a message in the yearbook. But Allred acknowledged the last part, including the date and location, was written by Nelson.

“Beverly indicates she added that to remind herself of who Roy Moore was and where and when Mr. Moore signed her yearbook,” Allred said.

Allred said a handwriting expert named Arthur T. Anthony determined that the signature is Moore’s and released a report of his findings.

“I want everyone to know that I stand by my previous statement that Roy Moore sexually assaulted me,” Nelson said.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...candidate.html

It doesn't even appear on the Foxnews.com homepage. Oh, but the victim-blaming video from Roy sure is.

Searching "nelson forged moore signature" brought me to this:

To summarize, Nelson says she added the time and location to the inscription. But she says the note and signature was from Moore.

That’s not what the headlines of the Gateway Pundit, Breitbart or Silence is Consent. All three say Nelson said she either tampered with Moore’s signature or forged the inscription.

There’s no evidence of that.

Yet, the Gateway Pundit wrote that "Nelson admitting that she added to Moore’s alleged signature is the final nail in the coffin," the story reads. "Allred’s accuser is nothing but a fame-seeking fraud."

Fox News made a similar misstatement in their headline and story about the ABC report, which they later walked back.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...forge-yearboo/

So your "forged signature" story appears to be fake news.

[Berzerker]

“Beverly indicates she added that to remind herself of who Roy Moore was and where and when Mr. Moore signed her yearbook,” Allred said.

The guy sexually assaulted her and she needed a yearbook reminder?

[Ben Kenobi]

So your "forged signature" story appears to be fake news.

Must be nice to be able to outright reject evidence that you don't like as 'fake news'. Why don't you just admit that the Dim's and their plan to smear Moore has failed? Just because they've lost all their credibility doesn't mean you have to do the same.

[-Jrabbit]

I provided a Foxnews.com link. Where is your link to proof that the signature is forged? Gee, none offered.
The facts say that you and Kid are the one outright rejecting documented evidence.

[Berzerker]

Actually this addition she made to the yearbook doesn't help Moore, its still his signature...

On the other hand I see Trump is making hay about it without explaining what she "forged". The signature aint forged, experts already identified Moore as the author. I doubt she ever said her comment was Moore's writing, just the well wishing and signature.

[Kidlicious]

Actually this addition she made to the yearbook doesn't help Moore, its still his signature...

Yes it does. She's a fraud. She only came forward and admitted it because a hand writting expert analysed it. You're desperate. Moore is going to win. Democrats are going to keep accusing him of sexual misconduct but we don't know if it's true. You just have your wish.

On the other hand I see Trump is making hay about it without explaining what she "forged". The signature aint forged, experts already identified Moore as the author. I doubt she ever said her comment was Moore's writing, just the well wishing and signature.

She's a fraud, period. Get over it.

[Kidlicious]

So-called “fact-checking” websites have objected to Breitbart News’ use of the term “forgery” to describe the yearbook that Roy Moore accuser Beverly Young Nelson and her lawyer, Gloria Allred, have used in attempting to corroborate Nelson’s allegation that Moore sexually assaulted her some 40 years ago.


Politifact labeled the claim “Pants on Fire,” and Facebook has even attached a pop-up warning to a Breitbart article about the alleged forgery.

On Friday, Nelson admitted that she had added “notes” to an inscription that she claimed Moore made in her high school yearbook. She still claims that Moore signed the yearbook, but admitted that some of the writing was hers.

That is textbook forgery.

Black’s Law Dictionary defines “forgery” as follows (original emphasis):

forgery, n. 1. The act of fraudulently making a false document or altering a real one to be used as if genuine … 2. A false or altered document made to look genuine by someone with the intent to deceive … 3.Under the Model Penal Code, the act of fraudulently altering, authenticating, issuing, or transferring a writing without appropriate authorization.

Note that forgery includes altering a real document. It does not matter if part of the document — say, the signature — is real. If any part of the document is altered and presented as original and authentic, it is a forgery and the entire document is legally useless — or worse than useless, since it impeaches the credibility of the person presenting it.

FACTS!

You are fake news!