Fake News Reporting Thread

[Proteus_MST]

If that is true then it isn't legal. But then we are talking about CNN so....

Why not?
If I am the sole producer of a drug and the price isn't regulated, I am free to set my price at will, as long as the health insurers (or uninsured patients) are willing to pay for it.
That`s capitalism, baby

Tommy Robinson. You said that he violated people's privacy.

You mean the one who filmed the participants in the "grooming gangs" trials

Well, I don't know about the USA, but in european countries usually still the principle "in dubio pro reo" is in force.

Lets come up with an example:
Say someone films an accused in a child rape case and publishes the video on the internet.

People see this video and find out the address of the person.
Afterwards (while the trial is still running) this person is harrassed by everyone in his environment and then, due to the pressure, commits suicide.

In the end it is found out that the accused was totally innocent and someone else was the rapist.

One innocent person lost his life due to someone taking the law in his own hands and publishing details (address or videos of the person) on the internet.


This is the behavior you defend

(and actually there are a lot of real cases out there, were falsely accused people had their names or faces published on the internet by "activists", commited suicide (or were killed by other "activists") and later turned out to be innocent)

[Kidlicious]

Why not?
If I am the sole producer of a drug and the price isn't regulated, I am free to set my price at will, as long as the health insurers (or uninsured patients) are willing to pay for it.
That`s capitalism, baby



You mean the one who filmed the participants in the "grooming gangs" trials

Well, I don't know about the USA, but in european countries usually still the principle "in dubio pro reo" is in force.

Lets come up with an example:
Say someone films an accused in a child rape case and publishes the video on the internet.

People see this video and find out the address of the person.
Afterwards (while the trial is still running) this person is harrassed by everyone in his environment and then, due to the pressure, commits suicide.

In the end it is found out that the accused was totally innocent and someone else was the rapist.

One innocent person lost his life due to someone taking the law in his own hands and publishing details (address or videos of the person) on the internet.


This is the behavior you defend

(and actually there are a lot of real cases out there, were falsely accused people had their names or faces published on the internet by "activists", commited suicide (or were killed by other "activists") and later turned out to be innocent)

There is a difference between reporting news (freedom of information), and harassing people. Actually both are legal in the US. They can't come on your property if you have a fence though. The guy that shot Trayvon Martin gets harassed all the time. He gets threatened too. But people have the right here to know that he is the one that shot Trayvon Martin. It's unfortunate for individuals, but it is better for society to have freedom of information.

And of course I do not believe in harassing people, either Muslims or Trump aids.

[self biased]

ICE counsel sentenced to four years for identity theft of immigrants.

[pchang]

Kid announcing that NPR is fake news in 3...2...1...

[Kidlicious]

Tucker Carlson: Do not listen to any other news source besides Fox.
Hannity: Go ahead, bring me proof. I won't believe you.
Kidicious: Thank you sir, may I have another (while assuming the position).

I suppose this is your way of insisting that CNN is acceptable.

[Proteus_MST]

Just so you know, the democrats will launch the civil war on 7/4

Alex Jones on Infowars says it, so it must be true ... at least in Trumps alternate universe

https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1013566507052175360

[Kidlicious]

CNN is reporting that calling them fake news is inciting violence.

[Aeson]

How do you think drug company doctors make $300,000+/year and drug company execs make $1,000,000+/year?

Politicians are paid to defend this. First in campaign donations, and then as high paid lobbyists. Fox is paid to put out propaganda claiming the US system is the best (true only for the rich) and voters like Kid lap it up.

I think vB must also be paid to keep it quiet ... not sure why else this post would be held for moderation ... where's my split of the money?

[Dinner]

Tucker Carlson: Do not listen to any other news source besides Fox.
Hannity: Go ahead, bring me proof. I won't believe you.
Kidicious: Thank you sir, may I have another (while assuming the position).

No one ever accused Kid of being intelligent.

[Kidlicious]

This is coming from the people that watch CNN. I'm glad that you think I'm stupid Dinner. It wouldn't make sense otherwise.

[Kidlicious]

An Indian reporter asked if he could make a quick comment at the WH press conference and another reporter yelled "No!" It's probably CNN's Acosta unless there is another reporter behaving as badly as him.

The Indian reporter told SHS that she is welcome at any Indian food restaurant. I love Indian food.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/02/indian-reporter-restaurant-sarah-sanders-welcome/

[Dinner]

So much derp out of kidiot.

[Dinner]

Why won't Arson institute dumb reps? There are so many posts which need dumb reps.

[Aeson]

Congress is filled with dumb reps!

[Kidlicious]

So much derp out of kidiot.

Oh, that's a good defense for your favorite hero journalists.