It's clearly a neocon position, exactly the same as the reasoning offered for invading Iraq.
Regardless of what should have been done in the past ... invading now that they have 20 or so nukes would ensure a horrific outcome. The Kim's have for 60 years shown they aren't crazy enough to do the thing (break the armistice) they know would result in the end of their reign. But it's obvious that in the face of losing the nukes would be used.
Regardless of what should have been done in the past ... invading now that they have 20 or so nukes would ensure a horrific outcome. The Kim's have for 60 years shown they aren't crazy enough to do the thing (break the armistice) they know would result in the end of their reign. But it's obvious that in the face of losing the nukes would be used.
Comment