Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Non-proliferation is for sissies, nukes for everyone!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by rah View Post
    Quick question, Would the press be going rabid if Trump recommended someone to be the ambassador to Germany who just happened to be a friend of Merkel?
    Is Merkel an evil, money grabbing, mafia type, dictator? If not, then...no
    "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by rah View Post
      Quick question, Would the press be going rabid if Trump recommended someone to be the ambassador to Germany who just happened to be a friend of Merkel?
      German press? Depends if it's the more Merkel-friendly part...nah

      I'd say most of the serious media would see it as lack of political "tact" so to speak (regardless of political leaning), so not positive, but I'd say it's (like the Farage thing) more of an episode, not a serious issue.
      Blah

      Comment


      • #33
        Is Merkel an evil, money grabbing, mafia type, dictator? If not, then...no
        What difference does that make? Really.
        Isn't the goal of an ambassador to facilitate relationships. Whether good or evil?

        I am being serious here. Is the implication that if they're buddies, he's going to sell us out? That's absurd.
        It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
        RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by rah View Post
          What difference does that make? Really.
          Isn't the goal of an ambassador to facilitate relationships. Whether good or evil?

          I am being serious here. Is the implication that if they're buddies, he's going to sell us out? That's absurd.
          Actually, I think I may agree with you on further reflection. I really believe that the concern is that he may not be harsh enough on Russia due to possible Oil deals...it is always about the oil, remember?
          "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

          Comment


          • #35
            What he's going to be soft and tell him we won't nuke the crap out of them.
            Let's be real, how often is an ambassador given permission to seriously threaten a host country?

            I'd much rather have an ambassador that was friendly with a leader if things ever get to the brink.

            Deals are the best when both sides win, and that is usually the starting point for any negotiations.

            And in all honesty I was really negative about it until I thought about it more too.
            It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
            RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by PLATO View Post
              R E X

              It is ALL about the Oil. NATO could set up in Moscow's suburbs and Putin wouldn't care if he got billions of dollars out of it and was able to keep oppresing his people.
              I think you're vastly underestimating Putin. He's certainly a dick, but that doesn't mean he doesn't care about Russia and indeed see himself as a major historical figure in its future. A lot of what he says about balance between the major powers also happens to be true. I think we all got sucked in by the 'Russia is yesterdays news' phase, and havent adapted anywhere near quick enough to its re-emergence. Much of what he's talking about now would have been obvious during the cold war when everyone was careful about each geo-political move made. Russia today isn't anything like as powerful as the Soviet Union from then, but then again we have a lot of other things to factor in these days including the rising giant of China.

              It feels like it would be a very good idea for us to go back to being very careful, which just makes a Trump presidency even more terrifying.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                America could have done the same thing with you, Kentonio.
                And would have done if they thought it was in their best strategic interests. Countries don't have friends, much as we like to pretend they do.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Suez.
                  One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Bingo.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      And would have done if they thought it was in their best strategic interests. Countries don't have friends, much as we like to pretend they do.
                      Lots of us Canadians did the same. Maybe you should open your eyes a bit.
                      Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                      "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                      2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                        Lots of us Canadians did the same. Maybe you should open your eyes a bit.
                        Did the same what? Be specific.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Wait a second, didn't hitler declare war on the US?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Yeah, but it was Bush's fault.
                            Blah

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X