Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here we go again: almost all diet advice is wrong (again)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    I never disagreed with that.
    Perhaps you didn't mean to, but your claims about calories in vs calories out being 100% of the issue say otherwise.

    For instance I have an extremely fast metabolism. This is mostly because I'm 22 years old.
    So calories into a younger person are not tthe same in regards to weight as into an older person? Is that what you're trying to say?

    It STILL does not change calories in vs calories out.
    Of course it doesn't change that ... that's always going to be stupid.

    You've just tweaked the coefficients a bit.
    Your claim was 100% of the equation was calories in vs calories out ... changing the formula is refuting your argument.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Pedotard View Post
      So your metabolism can increase by a whopping 4% when you completely change your diet. In other words a calorie is pretty much just a calorie.
      You are being extremely dishonest... purposefully, IMO.

      Forty-two percent of the increase in energy expenditure after the H diet was explained by the increase in gluconeogenesis. The cost of gluconeogenesis was 33% of the energy content of the produced glucose.

      Forty-two percent of the increase in energy expenditure after the H diet was explained by the increase in gluconeogenesis. The cost of gluconeogenesis was 33% of the energy content of the produced glucose.
      Being an idiot doesn't help your case. That 4% was based on the total caloric intake of the diet (I'm guessing... I didn't examine the part you cherry-picked from, you could be very well making it up). Sadly for you, the protein rich diet was only 55% protein.

      Reading helps

      nitwit
      To us, it is the BEAST.

      Comment


      • #78
        "Energy in versus energy out. ... that is the only consideration."
        "Calories in vs. calories out. ... That's it. That's 100% of losing weight."

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
          How is that relevant at all? It still means that by eating less you can lose weight. So different people might have different needs. But they can still lose weight. Jesus christ.
          You've DanSed out the algebra bit, but let's go with this. Edit: Did you double DanS me, or am I losing it?

          Person A requires X hours of exercise to lose Y pounds.
          Person B requires 2X hours of exercise to lose Y pounds.
          Exercising for X hours requires Z willpower.
          Person A and Person B each have 1.5Z willpower.
          Person A is capable of losing Y pounds.
          Person B is not.
          Person A is a hero who understands thermodynamics!
          Person B is a loser who should be fat-shamed!
          Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
          "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Sava View Post
            no

            weight loss is a behavioral issue

            telling someone "take in less calories than you burn" is simple and unhelpful

            it doesn't matter if it is technically correct

            the whole purpose of discussing weight loss is to come up with effective strategies

            that's not a strategy... that's something a child would respond with or some jackass trying to be too literal
            Meds need to be taken into account too. I lost 35 kg in one year by changing my diabetes meds.
            Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
            I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
            Also active on WePlayCiv.

            Comment


            • #81
              Also, pedotard, different kinds of calories are stored by the body in different ways. Muscle growth/repair requires higher amounts of protein. Highly refined sugars and flours tend to be stored as fat.

              Going back to your argument about losing fat versus losing weight, if you are interested in losing fat and your body replacing that tissue with muscle (re-composition without a change in overall mass), you need to eat a protein rich diet.

              Studies in animals have documented that, compared with glucose, dietary fructose induces dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. To assess the relative effects of these dietary sugars during sustained consumption in humans, overweight and obese subjects consumed glucose- or fructose-sweetened beverages …


              http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?t...20to%20adipose.



              This is very basic stuff.

              Do you want more? I don't mind dishing out punishment.

              So yes. Carbs make you fat.
              To us, it is the BEAST.

              Comment


              • #82
                Weather is 100% thermodynamics. Weather causes obesity!
                “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                "Capitalism ho!"

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Nikolai View Post
                  Meds need to be taken into account too. I lost 35 kg in one year by changing my diabetes meds.
                  Yes.

                  Lots of things can mess with hormones. Metabolism can be affected by such things in a dramatic way. Willpower doesn't enter into the equation in this regard at all. You can't will your body into releasing different kinds of hormones.
                  To us, it is the BEAST.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Where does the willpower to do the things to develop willpower come from? That's what I want to know ...

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Aeson View Post
                      Where does the willpower to do the things to develop willpower come from? That's what I want to know ...
                      Calories, obviously.
                      “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                      "Capitalism ho!"

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Aeson View Post
                        Where does the willpower to do the things to develop willpower come from? That's what I want to know ...
                        obviously, from your "soul" which is a metaphysical entity outside of your body

                        it is not affected by things like brain chemistry, hormones, activity level, genetic predisposition
                        To us, it is the BEAST.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          I like to think I'm constantly breaking the laws of physics ... just by wanting to. But the damn spoon never bends

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            There is no spoon, Aeson. Time to learn that.
                            Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
                            I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
                            Also active on WePlayCiv.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Sava View Post
                              You are being extremely dishonest... purposefully, IMO.

                              Forty-two percent of the increase in energy expenditure after the H diet was explained by the increase in gluconeogenesis. The cost of gluconeogenesis was 33% of the energy content of the produced glucose.



                              Being an idiot doesn't help your case. That 4% was based on the total caloric intake of the diet (I'm guessing... I didn't examine the part you cherry-picked from, you could be very well making it up). Sadly for you, the protein rich diet was only 55% protein.

                              Reading helps

                              nitwit
                              I didn't examine the part you cherry-picked from
                              Reading helps
                              You're a troll.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                If there is no spoon then how do I eat my Captn Crunch?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X