Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
View Post
Did the police get out of the car and pump bullets into Mr. Brown after he had hit the officer in the car and then begun to flee the scene?
Did more than one officer fire his gun, because I don't know of any semi-automatic pistol which carries 12 rounds in a clip?
EDIT: per this cnn story, the gun he was carrying was a sig p229 .40 calibre with 13 rounds. 12 casings were found and 1 round was left in the gun. http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/25/justic...ury-documents/
Overall the physical evidence is consistent with the police officer's testimony, and the police officer's testimony is also consistent with a justifiable homicide. I'm not sure if there is an alternate theory of events which is consistent with the physical evidence and which is also inconsistent with justifiable homicide - I am more than willing to hear such a theory, if one exists. I am pretty sure that the testimony of eyewitnesses who have made some of the more inflammatory claims are inconsistent with the physical evidence (not that this last point is particularly important in determining whether or not the homicide was justifiable - just pointing out that many of the facts being taken at face value by protesters are in fact lies).
Lastly, I want to point out that police officers have a right and duty to apprehend violent criminals. If (as is consistent with the physical evidence) Mr. Brown attempted to grab the police officer's weapon, or otherwise assaulted the officer, then Mr. Brown immediately becomes the justified target of pursuit and arrest, by that officer or any other. And if he resists arrest in a manner dangerous to the police then they are justified in using the minimal effective force to stop him, up to and including shooting him in the head - which (if the officer's testimony is true) seems like it basically happened, given a lone police officer and an 18 year-old man who weighed 300 lbs and stood 6'4".
Comment