Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do gun owners ever feel guilty after a gun accident involving their gun?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
Try again.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
I don't think you understand how math works. 175 kids die a year from guns. Even if each household with guns has like 20 guns, that's still a miniscule risk. There are actually more households with guns than swimming pools.
If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post175 kids die a year from guns.
(hint, you are wrong... try google)
When you want to enter the realm of facts, let me know.
Also, in addition to using faulty math, the authors cherrypicked "children under ten".
Sadly, teenagers die from guns too.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention though. I had a high opinion of the authors of Freakonomics but haven't read the book. Now I know I can avoid it.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostWhat's your thoughts on Pool control, Doc Strangelove? Should there be requirements on securing your pool from unauthorized access?
If a seven year old drowns in my pool I won't rest until I find the B*****d who planted a pool on my premisis. This isn't Los Angeles you know."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostRead the article again.
They falsely use total number of guns vs households with guns. They cherry-pick "children under ten".
And you say I don't understand math?
Furthermore, there's a focus on household accidents (which is the thread topic, but if you want to talk about pools being more deadly than guns, you're being extremely dishonest by not looking at total gun deaths)... further skewing the numbers. Luckily for them, pools mainly kill children at homes. Sadly, guns are a lot more mobile and able to wreak havoc everywhere they are.
If you are legitimately arguing this idiocy and not trolling, we're done here. I don't have time today for such stupidity.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
The risk presented by guns is much worse by orders of magnitude than you are trying to make it out to be.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sava View Post
These are facts, but they are either irrelevant to this discussion, or supports to pool contention.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostSo let's see..."children under twenty"..."More than half of the gun injuries involved an attack on the child, but nearly one-third were unintentional"..."Three of four hospitalizations of children younger than 10 resulted from accidental injuries."..."84 percent of these shootings involved teens aged 15 to 19, and two-thirds of those were related to assaults"...""Some of these are school shootings, some are gang-related, some are related to fights or disagreements"...
These are facts, but they are either irrelevant to this discussion, or supports to pool contention.
Good plan
BTW, it seems to me that guns only get more deadly to a particular age group the older you get (up until a certain point, obviously).
The danger with pools seems to dissipate quite rapidly the more aware and in control of yourself you get as you age.
Solid argument.
moronsTo us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
These are facts, but they are either irrelevant to this discussion, or supports to pool contention.
Look, Sava - even the good doctor agrees with you that pools are more dangerous than guns to children.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
Comment