If abortion was to be made illegal ....

[DaShi]

Actually gay men would be more affected by abortion than straight men, since they rely on adoption for children.

[Ben Kenobi]

I have an interest in civil rights and human rights in general.

You're one of the most obtuse/clueless posters on here.

So you support killing babies?

[SlowwHand]

Actually gay men would be more affected by abortion than straight men, since they rely on adoption for children.

Right. Only gay men rely on adoption. We're not even talking about adoption, though. The thread is about abortion, which I'm against, in a general statement.
My observation was that it was unlikely that a gay man would be personally involved in such a situation. Objectively...maybe; if we're going to handcuff abortion and adoption.

[loinburger]

The thread is about abortion, which I'm against, in a general statement.

Unless it would eliminate deviant genes from the gene pool, i.e. you're against abortion except when this is trumped by your support of eugenics.

[DaShi]

Right. Only gay men rely on adoption. We're not even talking about adoption, though. The thread is about abortion, which I'm against, in a general statement.
My observation was that it was unlikely that a gay man would be personally involved in such a situation. Objectively...maybe; if we're going to handcuff abortion and adoption.

Not only gay men, but gay men as a group. Straight men as a group, don't have this problem. Thus, MrFun's opinion on this matter carries more weight than yours.

[BlackCat]

So you support killing babies?

Killing babies is illegal, so why do you bring that up in a thread about abortion ?

[MrFun]

So you support killing babies?

What does abortion have to do with killing babies?

[MrFun]

My observation was that it was unlikely that a gay man would be personally involved in such a situation. Objectively...maybe; if we're going to handcuff abortion and adoption.

Heaven forbid if a person stands up for the rights of people of another group.

I'm white so following your inane "logic," I cannot have any interest in the civil rights or human rights of black people.

[SlowwHand]

Read your previous post and realize what a dumb**** you are.

[MrFun]

BK is a dumbshit for thinking killing babies is the same thing as abortions.

And it's interesting how once I call you out on your "logic" that instead of responding to the point, you spew another personal insult.

[SlowwHand]

Your definition of a baby is not the same as mine. What's so hard for you to grasp?
I don't know, but I would think that a gay couple would be relatively lower on the waiting list. Wouldn't it be advantageous from your perspective to restrict abortion as a means of birth control?

[molly bloom]

Haven't you made being gay your entire identity?

Preferable in so many ways to being a deceitful rightwing tight arsed virgin.

[molly bloom]

Right, men are so irrelevent to this issue that when they make a baby

Men make babies ? Something tells me biology was not your favourite science subject. Even two tangoing gay men still wouldn't be able to produce a baby- unless of course they'd had one made earlier with, say, a lesbian surrogate mother.

Are you secretly a fan of early John Waters' films ? Somehow I think not.

[molly bloom]

So you support killing babies?

Absolutely. Well-seasoned and properly cooked they can supply several nutritious meals.

Let me make a Modest Proposal....

I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout.

I do therefore humbly offer it to public consideration that of the hundred and twenty thousand children already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one-fourth part to be males; which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle or swine; and my reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore one male will be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in the sale to the persons of quality and fortune through the kingdom; always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump and fat for a good table. A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends; and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.

http://art-bin.com/art/omodest.html

[MrFun]

Your definition of a baby is not the same as mine. What's so hard for you to grasp?
I don't know, but I would think that a gay couple would be relatively lower on the waiting list. Wouldn't it be advantageous from your perspective to restrict abortion as a means of birth control?

1) I was being facetious in "not" understanding your stupid definition.

2) I would not want to deny women their right to make their own health decisions just to obtain some kind of advantage.

3) I have no interest in adopting a child.