Originally posted by Sava
View Post
That's not the point. The point is, should that lump of cells be given the same legal status as people who have been born. It would be an absolutely ridiculous and unprecedented statement with no ethical, moral, or religious justification. It's simply arbitrary. Birth is arbitrary. But it's a more significant milestone in human development... and one that makes sense.
I guess if you look at milestones, then conception would be one also. That seems to make the same sense as using Birth. I would imagine that Brain Activity would be a more scientific milestone for the threshold of human life to some??
Should late term abortions be banned? That's not the point either. Should driving your car on two wheels be banned? Why even bother wasting government resources on enforcing that? It almost never happens. But in the case of late term abortion, it happens mostly because of health concerns to the mother. But then you get idiots like Ben who just deny reality.
What is the point...as you see it?
------------------------
Any person who has actually read the Bible and possesses a modicum of intelligence, can easily get an idea for the value God places on an infant's life... let alone a fetus. Adam wasn't even a person until God breathed life into him. I know the authors of the Bible weren't out to set precedent on when personhood starts. But considering those filth ridden dip****s lived in an era of insanely high infant mortality, the attitude that you should count your chickens until they hatch would probably prevail over the notion that a few cells is the moral equivalent of a person.
Well...if we are to bring the Bible into it... Jeremiah 1:5 is compelling on personhood imho.

The point is moot, obviously. It's settled law. Abortions are a constitutionally protected right. Public opinion on the issue has largely been unchanged since Roe v Wade. It's not likely the support will ever be there for a constitutional amendment banning abortion... or much of anything else for that matter. Though, I could see congress granting legal personhood to corporations in the form of an amendment way before they do so for human embryos.
Every law can be changed if it is the will of the people acting through the Constitutional process. What you are saying is that it is "settled" for now. Personhood for corporations is an interesting avenue that would have a lot of interesting applications. Would an unfriendly takeover be murder?

The anti-choice nutbags do more to hurt their cause than help it. Ben is probably on the more intelligent side of that lot... and look how utterly out of touch he is with normals. Such activists are collectively the crotchety, old, retarded person at the Thanksgiving table that everyone else talks **** about behind their back. They've marginalized themselves even within their own families with their idiotic extremist nonsense.
Just as I advocate tolerance among those that are pro-life, I do so as well among those that are pro-choice. Ben is not right in pounding people continually over the head about his beliefs and you are not either. The stereotypical image that you try to create only shows intolerance and ignorance of who may or may not believe something. tsk...tsk...

This is only news now because the Republican party is itself marginalized... and likely on life support... barely surviving by pandering to those nutbags. Unless the moderates are let back in the clubhouse, the crazies are going to ensure the party is electorally irrelevant for decades.
So by all means, I hope they continue to bang their heads into the brick wall. Eventually, they'll bleed out and die... becoming just another comical historical oddity in the history of American politics.
So by all means, I hope they continue to bang their heads into the brick wall. Eventually, they'll bleed out and die... becoming just another comical historical oddity in the history of American politics.
And thus we descend into political party bashing. Sad, my friend. While it is true that a higher percentage of Republicans are pro-life than Democrats, it is an issue that spans political parties. Now, certainly it being a plank in the Republican platform may to some extent justify your rant, it is most likely not going to cause the Republican party to go away. It will simply drive those that it is a major issue for either to or from the party.
Comment