The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Bill Clinton was basically just playing Mad Men. It's not a national security matter, but he was a sleazy boss who was grabby with the young ladies in his office. Defending him is kind of odd behavior for feminists.
QFMFT
If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Uh, what's the problem with drone warfare? Is that somehow worse than regular warfare?
With regular warfare, we at least can pretend we are doing all we can to avoid civilian casualties.
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
With regular warfare, we at least can pretend we are doing all we can to avoid civilian casualties.
Actually, in some ways drone warfare (in the future, with better drones) might turn that around. Right now, a Marine walks down a road and sees a teenage boy running towards him with what looks like a rifle. He's going to shoot him, right? Probably close to 100% of the time. He's afraid for his life, and will defend himself, even if it turns out it's a toy gun and the boy is running out to thank him for saving the family from Al Qaeda. But with drones, with sufficiently good sensors/etc. and a thoroughly developed rules of engagement, you can allow more time to identify friend or foe (or civilian) since it's not the end of the world if a drone is lost (particularly if we get better at making drones that are both more resistant to being lost, at least to regular gun fire, and cheaper to make).
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.
Actually, in some ways drone warfare (in the future, with better drones) might turn that around. Right now, a Marine walks down a road and sees a teenage boy running towards him with what looks like a rifle. He's going to shoot him, right? Probably close to 100% of the time. He's afraid for his life, and will defend himself, even if it turns out it's a toy gun and the boy is running out to thank him for saving the family from Al Qaeda. But with drones, with sufficiently good sensors/etc. and a thoroughly developed rules of engagement, you can allow more time to identify friend or foe (or civilian) since it's not the end of the world if a drone is lost (particularly if we get better at making drones that are both more resistant to being lost, at least to regular gun fire, and cheaper to make).
I'm opposed to warfare in general, but okay with it if it involves super-intelligent robots. Maybe someday we can have drone politicians as well.
With regular warfare, we at least can pretend we are doing all we can to avoid civilian casualties.
I don't see how this changes with drones. They're no different than manned airstrikes. Let's get rid of all our bombers, attack helicopters, and fixed-wing close-air support! Artillery, too, while we're at it. In fact, we should just go ahead and wipe out all our fire support and have an army composed entirely of maneuver units. There's a plan for success.
If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
I think the problem with drones right now is that they're not equipped with good enough sensors to allow someone to make an accurate FoF identification, so sometimes they end up firing at the wrong people, and/or not seeing civilians in the area of the target. I suspect also that they're new enough that we just don't have good enough RoE yet to minimize civilian casualties. But I'm optimistic.
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.
Their sensors (for that purpose) are really no worse than anything you have on an F-16. The sensors you use for identifying bad guys is usually infantry on the ground directing fire support. When we do drone strikes in Pakistan or in places where we don't have infantry, we have to rely on intelligence assets.
Our rules of engagement in Afghanistan are already ludicrously strict. Civilians die in war, it's inevitable. I'd love to see civilian casualties go down, but not to the point where we lose wars. (This of course is assuming that the war is worth the cost in human lives, and I'm talking more generally than Afghanistan right now.)
If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Since World War II, iirc, and probably World War I, fire support has killed far more enemy combatants than infantry. Infantry these days are mostly useful for directing fire support, which is the stuff that actually kills people. I spoke to a retired army officer (LtCol I think?) back in December who was in charge of some infantry training thing (forget which) and he told me that for most soldiers in the US Army, their rifle was pretty much a piece of jewelry. Mostly their job in combat is to help the airplanes and helicopters and artillery batteries hit their targets, and to hold strategic positions.
Maybe MTG will come in and correct me, and if so, I defer to his wisdom.
If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
There was an article on BBC a while ago about a drone controller (or whatever you call the guys who pushes buttons for those things) who had witnessed a child getting killed in an operation and quit his job over it. The message being the psychological impact of knowing you're reponsible for the death of an innocent person. Which is a bit ironic because drones are also often criticised for being these dehumanizing objects that shields the killers from facing the consequences of their actions.
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
It was during a sexual harassment trial. Not a witch hunt. They weren't trying to nab him for cheating on his wife, he was getting sued because he relentlessly hit on his female staff and he used the Arkansas state cops as his pimping service.
It was during a sexual harassment trial. Not a witch hunt. They weren't trying to nab him for cheating on his wife, he was getting sued because he relentlessly hit on his female staff and he used the Arkansas state cops as his pimping service.
Comment