I had a scary thought. With all the first-responders and volunteers from other cities going to Boston, what if there was a nuclear device in Boston... and the attackers just set off the first bombs to lure in those kinds of people to the area.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Explosions at Boston Marathon
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Docfeelgood View PostI had just got home off the night shift from work on both accounts.
I was in elementary school when Watergate happened."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dinner View PostVery true.
Back to Sava's post, which I have been thinking about more. Sava claimed that other than it happening to be tax day there was nothing else to suggest the possibility of this being an attack by right wing extremists. I agree that there is no hard evidence and we'll have to wait to find out who actually did it to find out what motivated them but that said there is more than just the fact that it was tax day as a hint at a possible motivation.
-There is the fact that Post-Newtown massacre Massachusetts passed strong new gun control legislation which very publicly enraged many of the gun nuts on the far right.
-There is the fact that the particular last mile of the race was dedicated to the Sandy Hook victims and was being used as a fund raiser for additional gun control measures and that several of the Sandy Hook Families were reported in the media as going to attend the event; those are people the conspiracy nuts think are conspiring with Obama to steal their guns.
-It was tax day which is a date every right wing nutjob hates and uses for a rallying cry to action.
-Finally it is a city in a state which the die hard right wing extremists absolutely loath because it continues to be rich and highly successful despite all of their ideological talking points. Their two favorite states to hate are Massachusetts and California.
Again, none of that is conclusive of anything and we don't know if those facts motivated the attacker or not but it isn't fair to say there is nothing which wouldn't have made the event a tempting target for a right wing domestic terrorist. I suppose we will know in time.
Edit: Oh, I forgot! The gun nuts love to use the NRA talking point claiming massacres can be brought about without using guns therefor there is no need for gun control of any sort. Yes, I could see someone trying to prove a point (especially if they were deranged about Sandy Hook as so many Alex Jones listeners are, thinking it a conspiracy) by carrying out a mass killing out not using a gun. "See! All those people were killed despite Massachusetts new gun control law!" Ignoring that one untrained gunman killed two dozen or more in five minutes with an AR-15 while this bomber only managed to kill three with all his advanced planning.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Originally posted by DinoDoc View PostOut of interest, what were you posting in the aftermath of the Giffords shooting? Wasn't it something about the right wing?Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
Comment