Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Social Security- a "ponzi scheme?"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Seems like the most fair/'conservative' welfare system I've ever heard of... after all, normal welfare/AFDC/etc. is based on NOT working. At least Social Security is based on actually having worked in the past...
    Then make it voluntary to participate. Problem solved. If it's a 'fair' system, then why does it force people to pay into it?
    Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
    "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
    2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

    Comment


    • #17
      why not make all taxes voluntary, after all, how can any tax be fair if people are forced to pay it.
      "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

      "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

      Comment


      • #18
        Why are you morons still playing the definition game? (those of you asserting that SS is or is not a ponzi scheme) The only purpose you can have in asserting that it is would be to go "SS is a ponzi scheme, ponzi schemes are bad, ergo SS is bad" but we can independently figure out whether SS is bad without deciding whether it's a ponzi scheme. It a stupid rhetorical trick that doesn't even work very well, and it's intellectually dishonest.

        Comment


        • #19
          How the hell is social security a Ponzi scheme...not seeing it. Really, your American right-wing rhetoric is pretty crap.
          Speaking of Erith:

          "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

          Comment


          • #20
            Good thread, Zevico.
            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
            "Capitalism ho!"

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Kuciwalker View Post
              Why are you morons still playing the definition game? (those of you asserting that SS is or is not a ponzi scheme) The only purpose you can have in asserting that it is would be to go "SS is a ponzi scheme, ponzi schemes are bad, ergo SS is bad" but we can independently figure out whether SS is bad without deciding whether it's a ponzi scheme. It a stupid rhetorical trick that doesn't even work very well, and it's intellectually dishonest.
              The most obvious reason to deal with the label is that it was the topic of the article, and something a presidential candidate said. The comparison between SS and a ponzi scheme is thus not just a topic of "SS bad, dur!" as you suggest. It is also about the ability of the candidate to accurately assess SS, and convey meaning about it. Plus it's fun calling things by derogatory labels like "ponzi scheme", "moron", and "conversation Nazi".

              Comment


              • #22
                And "SS."
                “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                "Capitalism ho!"

                Comment


                • #23
                  Damn you! Damn you to hell for pointing out my stealth Godwinization!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by gribbler View Post
                    Okay, so how would they means-test the benefits? Would they reduce the payments you receive if you have more than a certain amount of wealth?
                    Yeah, exactly. Social Security should alleviate poverty among the elderly, not buy AARP votes.
                    John Brown did nothing wrong.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Zevico View Post
                      —- Michael Tanner is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and author of Leviathan on the Right: How Big-Government Conservatism Brought Down the Republican Revolution.
                      [/q]

                      Inspector Clouseau's assistant Cato has his own institute? And this British actor is secretly behind the current American rightwing policies? Now it all makes sense.
                      There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        CATO is one of the first right wing astroturf groups founded by the Koch brothers. Like all Koch brothers' astroturf groups it's job is to lie and spin in the popular media in order to shift public opinion towards supporting right wing policies which benefit mainly just the super rich, people like the Koch brothers. I can understand why the Kochs want public policy designed to enrich themselves but I will never understand how the dirt poor dumbasses in the trailer parks agree to back policies which are against their personal self interest.
                        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I don't know, the people pushing dumb policies aren't the ones calling them "dumbasses".

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Provost Harrison View Post
                            How the hell is social security a Ponzi scheme...not seeing it. Really, your American right-wing rhetoric is pretty crap.
                            Well with a ponzi scheme you pay people who paid in before in the hope that others will join in so that you get paid but you don't get paid. Likewise someone eventually will get similarly burned with SS.
                            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I did that to get past the filter. Much like using ****e instead of ****.
                              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by gribbler View Post
                                Okay, so how would they means-test the benefits? Would they reduce the payments you receive if you have more than a certain amount of wealth?
                                Why should they do that? Much more reasonable would be to reduce benefits if you have more than a certain amount of lifetime earnings.
                                12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                                Stadtluft Macht Frei
                                Killing it is the new killing it
                                Ultima Ratio Regum

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X