Originally posted by gribbler
View Post
1) There is a primitive concept of "fairness" that most people have. This is not well-defined, and I don't use it to judge the morality/desirability of actions, policies etc. However, it does have an impact on what people actually DO.
2) Exacting tribute as such from a sovereign neighbor which has had friendly relations with you for 150 years would be viewed by most people as unbelievably "unfair". So much so that the victim government would almost certainly respond to its own citizens' outrage (as well as being emboldened by the outrage of most rational governments around the world) and would react irrationally to the demand (at least from the sense of pure national interest).
3) The "fairness" question is murky when it comes to peaceful separation of formerly united political units. The Canadian government could (and would) make the point that it needed to protect the rights of Canadian citizens in Montreal who (by a huge majority) wished to remain in Canada. The newly sovereign QC government would make the point that previously pieces of QC had not been allowed to separate from the ROC, therefore it would be unfair to allow pieces of it to split off. Neither point is particularly strong relative to the other (once more demonstrating the uselessness of "fairness" as a moral guide). Self-interest would rule the day and given the inability of QC to do ****-all about it, ROC would annex Montreal and surrounding regions.
None of this is particularly novel, and if you'd bothered to think about my posts you would have realized precisely what I was saying.
Comment