Tweet
Yup, he's already in the center.
-
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!" -
Was the Right this unhinged with regard to Clinton?
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
Because he was successful and he didn't do what they wanted. That's basically it.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
I feel much better after reading this post.Originally posted by Oerdin View Post
For all of DanS and Drake's attemtps to jinx the results, it has been more than offset by the perpetually wrong predictions of O.
Thanks."Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy CarterComment
-
Accept for beating on Clinton just because he was a democrat, a lot of republicans didn't mind him that much since he was basically a republican at heart. I even voted for him at one point.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
The problem with Clinton wasn't his fiscal policies, which were really the policies of the conservative congress. The problem with Clinton was everything else he did. How quickly people forget his dealings with the Chinese as an example.Comment
-
Bombing them?“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"Comment
-
I think Obama is pretty similar, really. The progressive wing of the Democratic party is rip**** mad at him for a variety of reasons (compromises on healthcare reform, war policy, state secrets policy, wall street "reform" etc).Originally posted by rah View Post
Yet my Tea Partier co-worker steadfastly refers to him as the second coming of Stalin. I'm not exaggerating. He said Obama is just like Stalin. He wants to give capitalism a little push (off the cliff), you see, so he can then enact his Marxist vision.
This rhetoric is all over the place.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
I don't think Obama has an ounce of spending restraint in his body.I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891Comment
-
Which presidents have?“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"Comment
-
Who is the last President who did? Bush the Elder? Carter? Ford?Originally posted by DanS View Post
edit for clarity:
Even if Obama was fiscally cautious at heart, given the situation at the start of his Presidency we might not know that (based on policy). Fiscal restraint was not a great idea at the time. If he is a 2-termer, we'll find out for sure.
-ArrianLast edited by Arrian; October 27, 2010, 11:48.grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
Obama is the second coming of stalin. Just because progressives are mad at him for not going far enough doesn't change the fact that he's the most radical president that I can think of in recent history. Also, if he felt like he could go further, he would. You don't hang out with people like Van Jones and all the other commies and not be one yourself. You are who you associate with, and if you look at who Obama associates himself with and surrounds himself with, it's obvious. That's why Obama is not going to move to the center.Comment
-
Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kindsComment
-
The loon who works down the hall from me couldn't have said it better, Drix. Thanks so much for fleshing it out a bit.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
You call it crazy, but none of you ever say why it's crazy. If you hang out with a bunch of gangsters all the time and you call them friends and you appoint them as your advisers, would it be crazy to say that you are also a gangster? Pretty simple logic here. Then again, the left has never been known for logic and instead relies on emotional appeal, hypotheticals, and agreement of the masses as a norm. i.e. They just say it's crazy over and over without actually ever saying why or refuting the evidence, relying purely on everyone else agreeing that it's crazy to even think of it.Comment
Comment