Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What do you think of hate crimes?
Collapse
X
-
You know... why is it that in the US we don't have this problem? We have terrorists gunning to blow things up and crash planes into buildings but we don't have immigrant Muslims mobbing Americans. What are you Europeans doing wrong?"Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
-
In theory, there is probably a part of the parameter space where it makes sense to deter "beating him up because he's gay" over "beating him up because I felt like beating him up", etc., but I think it's a very narrow region and I don't feel like we're in it. Unlike other times in our* history, systematic violence against a minority group isn't really condoned anywhere, and I don't think there are that many people who would be deterred by the additional punishment a hate crime conviction would bring.Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny View PostAnd then I link them to examples of them being used on nutter Imams, or Muslim kids out to kill any Christian/Jew kids. And then those people act like they haven't seen me post, or declare that such examples are exceptions that prove a rule they have no figures for.
I've been down this road many times.
Also, while the courts are perfectly competent to judge motive, there is a civil liberties concern with introducing to the courtroom what is in practice a political test.
*American
Comment
-
Man, Laz is going to town.And then I link them to examples of them being used on nutter Imams, or Muslim kids out to kill any Christian/Jew kids. And then those people act like they haven't seen me post, or declare that such examples are exceptions that prove a rule they have no figures for.
Personally, I agree that intent is important, but the intent to kill someone because they looked at you funny, and the intent to kill someone because you thought they looked funny, is irrelevant. In both cases the intent to kill is there.
Hate crime laws are redundant and unnecessary. The laws already take intent into account.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
Ft. Hood anybody?we don't have immigrant Muslims mobbing Americans. What are you Europeans doing wrong?
Didn't you deny that 9-11 was done by Muslims already, Albert?Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
Again... I said:Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostFt. Hood anybody?
Didn't you deny that 9-11 was done by Muslims already, Albert?
You know... why is it that in the US we don't have this problem? We have terrorists gunning to blow things up and crash planes into buildings but we don't have immigrant Muslims mobbing Americans. What are you Europeans doing wrong?"Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
I don't read Ayn Rand, and I think hate crimes are a transparent attempt to wiggle around the first amendment and punish people for having the wrong opinions. If you think the crime is done as an attempt to intimidate the gay/latino/black/whoever community, tack on a terrorism charge, but none of this hate crime rubbish.
As a honky, if some radical follower of Farrakhan's decided to teach the spawn of Yakub a lesson and beat the **** out of me with a crowbar, I say he should be tried on a common assault and battery charge, or whatever the correct neutral charge would be. He can think I'm pure evil and an oppressor by nature, he can't attempt to kill me, or rape me, or vandalize my property. Non-crime + crime =/= bigger crime.
Comment
-
I believe there are a number of factors at work there. Some of it, IIUC, is economic. Poor Muslim immigrants come to European countries, can't get jobs, and waste away in ghettos for a little while before getting angry and setting cars on fire. Part of it is social; while America is pretty white-bread, we don't have an ethnically defined American culture (outside of Republicanland), so it's easier for immigrants to assimilate. But all this is just what I read--I've never been to Europe. Can I get some European perspectives?Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostYou know... why is it that in the US we don't have this problem? We have terrorists gunning to blow things up and crash planes into buildings but we don't have immigrant Muslims mobbing Americans. What are you Europeans doing wrong?
Comment
-
I have zero problem with adding additional sanctions when a crime is motivated by race, gender, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, etc.
Stringing up blacks in the 'Old South' was as much an attempt to terrorise a larger group of people as it was to settle a score with an individual. It was a more heinous crime than your run of the mill homicide over a disagreement.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
-
How do 'acts of terrorism' and 'hate crimes' differ? Does terrorism necessarily imply a wish to overthrow the government?"Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
Yes, that was exactly what I was talking about. The issue is that such conditions no longer exist - there's basically nowhere left where systematic violence against any given minority is condoned.Originally posted by notyoueither View PostI have zero problem with adding additional sanctions when a crime is motivated by race, gender, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, etc.
Stringing up blacks in the 'Old South' was as much an attempt to terrorise a larger group of people as it was to settle a score with an individual. It was a more heinous crime than your run of the mill homicide over a disagreement.
Comment
-
It's not obvious that terrorism ought to be a crime distinct from murder, etc., and laws specifically against terrorism often raise similar civil liberties concerns.Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostHow do 'acts of terrorism' and 'hate crimes' differ? Does terrorism necessarily imply a wish to overthrow the government?
Comment
-
Hate crimes should figure into sentencing ala motive but should not be a crime of themselves."Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostYes, that was exactly what I was talking about. The issue is that such conditions no longer exist - there's basically nowhere left where systematic violence against any given minority is condoned.
Matthew Shepard will rest easier knowing that.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
Comment