Ships to Gaza incident

[Al B. Sure!]

Oh my god you are so incessantly. ****ing. dumb. Welcome to my ignore list.

Mission. Accomplished.

[MrFun]

Why would I blow up in real life over morons on the internet?

(To answer your question, no)

I read your other temper tantrum posts in here where you accuse people of either being a tool or an anti-Semite if they disagree with Israel's foreign policies/decisions.

[Kitschum]

Heh

[Dinner]

Repelling into a mob of bat and knife welding fanatics equals fail.

[Kitschum]

Morons should have just let the ships through. Then nobody would have needed to die and this would hardly be newsworthy. Now the whole world is aware of the Gaza blockade and the suffering it causes. It will be lifted, it is only a matter of time now, and Israel would be wise to do so sooner rather than later.

[Dinner]

Morons should have just torpedoed the ships through.

Fixed. Let them whine about how unfair it all is after they've sank to the bottom.

[Kitschum]

If they wanted war with Turkey, that would have been a good tactic.

[Dinner]

Nonsense. Turkey, not even the current Islamist government, would not go to war over a civilian ship violating international law which was manned by extremists. In any event what could Turkey really do? Not a damn thing. The Israelis own them militarily, have nukes, and they share no common border. Even the Islamist government would do exactly what they're doing now; namely make speeches and do nothing else. The only difference would be the world would be a better place without a few lying pieces of **** in it.

[Kitschum]

Erdogan already compared the psychological impact of this event to 9/11 for the US. It's hyperbolic, but you can hardly overestimate the damage this has done in Turkish public opinion.

Turkey's position is that Israel is the one violating international law and they aren't alone in that opinion. It is a NATO country with an economy over 4x the size of Israel's and a capable military. I would think they could figure out some way to retaliate.

As for nukes, they are likely irrelevant unless it's an existential battle for Israel, but that is not what I'm suggesting. Israel has fought wars before without using nukes even when they had them.

[MOBIUS]

Oerdin, apart from the fact that the ships weren't even in Israeli waters, why have you such a hard on about international law anyway - considering your beloved Israel has been routinely breaking a number of international laws every single day for decades!?

Israel whining about other people breaking international law is the most extreme form of hypocrisy imaginable!

Still, it must work because they've got the gullible fools like you brainwashed...

[MOBIUS]

As for nukes, they are likely irrelevant unless it's an existential battle for Israel, but that is not what I'm suggesting. Israel has fought wars before without using nukes even when they had them.

In fact it's because Israel has nukes that nations like Iran and Syria are also trying to get them - not the other way around...

[Dinner]

The ships were in Israeli waters. They were 150 miles plus in Israelis exclusive economic zone and worse they publicly stated their goal was to break the law and land illegally. If all they wanted to do was deliver humanitarian supplies then Israel allows in ample amounts on a daily basis but instead these fanatics said they wanted to deliver cargo unscreened. If they only wanted to deliver humanitarian supplies then why not just deliver them via the proper channels? Israel offered to allow it. The only logical and reasonable answer is they wanted to set up delivery routes for weapons especially since the illegal landings were organized by an known affiliate of a terrorist organization. (Look up the weapons they shipped to mushahadeen fighters in Bosnia)

That Europeans continue to ignore these obvious and undeniable truths just show how baised and anti-Israeli they really are. They are totally treating Israel by a double standard. It's sad that they're pandering to such elements of their societies.

[Saras]

Leo2A4 vs Merkava IV.. Droooool...

[Dinner]

In fact it's because Israel has nukes that nations like Iran and Syria are also trying to get them - not the other way around...

That's because nations like Iran and Syria support international terrorism and we'll see their regimes dead before we allow known terrorist sponsors to have nukes. On the other hand Israel is a responsible actor attempting to prevent the destruction of their nation by Islamic terrorists who have vowed to destroy them. It's a cut and dried issue. If terrorist sponsors seek to get nukes then they will glow in the dark long before they get them while Israel is surrounded by nations swearing to drive them into the sea.

[Dinner]

Erdogan already compared the psychological impact of this event to 9/11 for the US. It's hyperbolic, but you can hardly overestimate the damage this has done in Turkish public opinion.

Erdogan can lambaste all he wants but the reality is the Turkish military has already threatened to over throw him on at least two occasions (for violating the Kemalic command of atheism) and militarily there is zero Turkey can do. Erdogan has already done just about every thing he can do to be hostile towards Israel since he took power so all he can do is make firey speeches and claim this mole hill is really a mountain. In two years no one will care.