Top 10 Anti-Christian Acts of 2009

[Kidlicious]

"All I'm saying is that God isn't against authority"
-Ben

You couldn't possibly have read the Gospel.

[Kidlicious]

Social conservatives had Jesus killed 2000 years ago...

[Ben Kenobi]

You couldn't possibly have read the Gospel.

I read all of it and not just the parts I like.

I don't see how you can interpret his statement to Pilate that the power he was granted was under the oversight of God. Christian anarchy is unbiblical.

[Ben Kenobi]

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court?

They were the ones who offered this opinion up in "Civil rights". There was zero precedent before them, and so by extolling this precedent you are siding with the Plessey court.

[Darius871]

They were the ones who offered this opinion up in "Civil rights". There was zero precedent before them, and so by extolling this precedent you are siding with the Plessey court.

No. I am siding with the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist courts. You'll note that these were concurrent with and subsequent to the success of the civil rights movement.

Since you're obviously ****ing blind as a bat:

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Who said anything about siding with the Plessey court? That was overruled by Brown. I'm siding with the Cruikshank, Harris, Civil Rights Cases, Hodges, Powell, Newton, Price, Guest, Williams I, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and Morrison courts, several of which post-date the Plessey court by roughly a century and the Brown court by decades.

FFS, the above-cited Guest reaffirmance of Cruikshank was during the Warren court to which you refer.

Can you not even read?

Welcome to ignore.

[Arrian]

Two pages of arguing with a guy who openly admits he thinks Obama is a Kenyan Muslim.

Even if you didn't know Ben, that right there should be enough to warn you off. And of course you know Ben.

-Arrian

[Boris Godunov]

I just find it amusing that Ben admonishes someone else about ignoring the parts of the Bible they don't like, while in the same thread Darius proves that he's doing that exact thing with regards to the Constitution and SCOTUS case precedents.

[Darius871]

Two pages of arguing with a guy who openly admits he thinks Obama is a Kenyan Muslim.

Even if you didn't know Ben, that right there should be enough to warn you off. And of course you know Ben.

-Arrian

Of course, but sometimes I get this itch that maybe using a gigantic sledgehammer when he's as wrong as possible just might squash him, but this guy's ability to weasel around the obvious makes Mr. Fantastic look like The Thing by comparison. I couldn't even do it that well on purpose. It's truly such a marvelous sight to see that I can't resist.

[Arrian]

[Kidlicious]

I read all of it and not just the parts I like.

I don't see how you can interpret his statement to Pilate that the power he was granted was under the oversight of God. Christian anarchy is unbiblical.

Being opposed to authority isn't anarchy. It's just smart. Religion requires continual reformation.

Sure Christ stated that God granted Pilate authority over him. That doesn't change the fact that Christ defied that authority.

[Elok]

Being opposed to authority isn't anarchy. It's just smart. Religion requires continual reformation.

Sure Christ stated that God granted Pilate authority over him. That doesn't change the fact that Christ defied that authority.

When did He defy it? He submitted tamely to the guards, made no attempt whatever to flee or escape. Barely even defended Himself against the accusations.

[Ben Kenobi]

Edit, elok already smacked that down.

[DaShi]

When did He defy it? He submitted tamely to the guards, made no attempt whatever to flee or escape. Barely even defended Himself against the accusations.

Christ was sentenced to death. But he came back to life in direct violation of the law.

[Boris Godunov]

After doing a little research, it seems of the original post's list of ten, all of them are bull****/exaggerated except maybe No. 8. Even there, it was not portrayed as a deliberate act, but rather an accident that set up the humorous situation of someone else later thinking the painting was crying and it was a miracle. Claiming it as an act of persecution against the Christian majority is pretty stupid.

[Elok]

After doing a little research, it seems of the original post's list of ten, all of them are bull****/exaggerated except maybe No. 8. Even there, it was not portrayed as a deliberate act, but rather an accident that set up the humorous situation of someone else later thinking the painting was crying and it was a miracle. Claiming it as an act of persecution against the Christian majority is pretty stupid.

Psst: The OP is a DL troll.