No, you're not getting it. Take Steven Hawkings for example - on his own, disabled, but as a member of our species he makes us better. Consider the species as a single entity. "Disabled" generally refers to only one or a small number of traits, while individuals are comprised of hundreds, or perhaps thousands of traits that relate to fitness.
In terms of the individual, in the human - or many other group species - "fitness" could be defined as "most cooperative". Although in reality, as I said above, there are many facets of fitness.
In terms of the individual, in the human - or many other group species - "fitness" could be defined as "most cooperative". Although in reality, as I said above, there are many facets of fitness.
Comment