I use IE maybe once, on a new computer, to download Firefox. Maybe 15 years ago, when browsers cost money, this would have had a point, but today, browsers are free. The only people being hurt by this stupidity are European computer users who install Windows 7.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Windows 7 to ship without a web browser in Europe
Collapse
X
-
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostThe only European web browser is Opera, and it is terribly awful.Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostShipping Windows without one means users are restricted in their choice to whatever they have available on physical mediums already. Restricts choice!I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Comment
-
No browser seems to be Microsofts idea
"In terms of potential remedies, if the Commission were to find that Microsoft had committed an abuse, the Commission has suggested that consumers should be offered a choice of browser not that Windows should be supplied without a browser at all," said the Commission in a statement responding to Microsoft's announcement.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DanS View PostMicrosoft chose to restrict choice in this manner. It could have created an easy installer that put all major browsers on equal footing. But instead, Microsoft chose to inconvenience its customers.
This is not even taking into account the Windows 7 code is on its way to release. Adding major new functionality like this would delay the product significantly and subject it to new rounds of testing.
They had two options: Write code and maintain lists/download sources for competitor's products and delay the release of Windows 7 to incorporate it to appease a retarded ruling by a retarded bureaucratic entity, or simply remove the browser from the EU release and let OEMs/people install whatever they want.
The latter is far more logical, especially considering the implications (legal and otherwise) of MS linking to sites they do not control from Windows. Consider:
- What happens if a user chooses Firefox during the WINDOWS INSTALL/SETUP and it encounters an issue. People will call MS support and ***** about it, by default. After all, to them, Windows installed it.
- What happens when the URL the tool points to is no longer valid or worse, for example...what happens if Opera's site is hacked and the .exe it downloads is a virus? What is MS' legal responsibility here?
If MS provided a sanctioned way to download their competitor's products, it opens them up to legal and technical issues they should not have to deal with it.
It's far better for them to remove IE from the OS and then point the finger squarely at the EU, which people are finding more and more to be a ridiculous overregulator.
PS: What browsers should they include? Opera, Safari, Firefox, Flock, K-Meleon, Mozilla, Chrome? In addition to being a confusing and complicating UI for most users who don't know or care about their browsers, it's an arbitrary list. There are hundreds of different browsers to install, who decides what is included or not?"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by tinyp3nis View PostNo browser seems to be Microsofts idea
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8096701.stm
They just fined MS over a billion dollars for bundling WMP and IE with Windows. MS removes them and the EU still *****es and needs to decide if they want to fine them again.
Get ****ed, EU. Tools."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostPS: What browsers should they include? Opera, Safari, Firefox, Flock, K-Meleon, Mozilla, Chrome? In addition to being a confusing and complicating UI for most users who don't know or care about their browsers, it's an arbitrary list. There are hundreds of different browsers to install, who decides what is included or not?
Fact is that since Microsoft has a monopoly in the OS, it is forbidden from using normal competitive business practices in adjacent markets. However, Microsoft is getting all pissy about it and thereby inconveniencing its customers.I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Comment
-
Doesn't Apple have a monopoly on the OS for Macs?“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
I think you're greatly exaggerating how tough it would be for Microsoft to do this. The list need not be arbitrary.
Comment
-
Well lets see, this will open up a market in Europe for pre-installed computers, which have everything loaded up.
Honestly, I can't see why people would demand them to remove their operating system. Mine came bundled with a whole pile of loser software, including Norton. So long as I am able to use the programs I want, it's not an issue.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostThe EU is so ****ing clueless they don't even comprehend what the implications of their whole ruling is.
They just fined MS over a billion dollars for bundling WMP and IE with Windows. MS removes them and the EU still *****es and needs to decide if they want to fine them again.
Get ****ed, EU. Tools.
the EU tells microsoft that it can't bundle IE and WMP with its OS, and then fines them.
the EU then wants to fine microsoft for not including them?I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
[Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostWell lets see, this will open up a market in Europe for pre-installed computers, which have everything loaded up.
Honestly, I can't see why people would demand them to remove their operating system. Mine came bundled with a whole pile of loser software, including Norton. So long as I am able to use the programs I want, it's not an issue.I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
[Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostThen why shouldn't MS throw Firefox et. al. to the bottom of a dozens-long list? And if the EU complains about that, then the question is: do we really want to government to essentially legislate the current leaders to be the only "real" competitors?I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Comment
Comment