Originally posted by snoopy369
You really are the BK of the left.
You get 70,000 if you use quotes around it, and most seem to refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_Democracy which is a STUB about a term invented to differentiate between direct democracies and 'thin' (representative) democracies in 1984.
"Strong Democracy" in the way you use it is similar to how the Democratic Peace Theory proponents differentiate between democracies that support their argument and those that aren't 'real democracies' and thus don't support their arguments. Either way it's a meaningless term used to weasel out of arguments that your theory is crap.
You really are the BK of the left.
You get 70,000 if you use quotes around it, and most seem to refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_Democracy which is a STUB about a term invented to differentiate between direct democracies and 'thin' (representative) democracies in 1984.
"Strong Democracy" in the way you use it is similar to how the Democratic Peace Theory proponents differentiate between democracies that support their argument and those that aren't 'real democracies' and thus don't support their arguments. Either way it's a meaningless term used to weasel out of arguments that your theory is crap.
This is an article talking about how we need better education to build a stronger democracy. Is this what you're talking about?
http://communities.annenbergclassroo...democracy.aspx
Comment